Large-scale land acquisitions aggravate the feminization of poverty: findings from a case study in Mozambique

Abstract

The local implications of large-scale land acquisitions (LSLAs), commonly referred to as land grabs, are at the center of an exponential production of scientific literature that only seldom focuses on gender. Our case study aims to contribute to filling this analytical gap. Based on structured interviews and focus groups, we investigate local experiences in the lower Limpopo valley in Mozambique, where a Chinese investor was granted 20,000 hectares in 2012. Our findings show that land access in the affected area varied prior to land seizure due to historical land use differences and after land seizure mainly due to non-universal compensation. Furthermore, we show that as farming conditions deteriorate, a trend toward both the feminization of smallholder farming and the feminization of poverty is consolidated. Succinctly, as available land becomes increasingly constricted, labor is allocated differently to alternative activities. This process is by no means random or uniform among households, particularly in a context in which women prevail in farm activities and men prevail in off-farm work. As men disengage further from smallholder farming, women remain directly dependent on fields that are smaller and of worse quality or reliant on precarious day labor in the remaining farms. We contend that the categories female-headed and male-headed households, although not inviolable, are useful in explaining the different implications of LSLAs in areas in which gender strongly substantiates individuals' livelihood alternatives.

Economic Benefits of Empowering Women in Agriculture: Assumptions and Evidence

“…Constraints to migration, and lower access to distant off-farm work and markets are also associated with women participating less than men in off-farm labour. In a study in Mozambique, Porsani, Caretta, and Lehtilä (2018) report that men migrate and/or allocate labour mainly to fixed-wage employment, cattle rearing, and off-farm activities in case of worsening farming conditions, whereas women allocate labour to on-farm activities including farming fields in exchange for cash and low return trading. In contrast, Lanjouw (2001) and Ruben (2001) conclude that women in female-headed households are more likely to participate in off-farm work as compared to male-headed households, although this may be primarily in low-productivity occupations.…”

Livelihood Impacts of Large-Scale Agricultural Investments Using Empirical Evidence from Shashamane Rural District of Oromia Region, Ethiopia

“…Apart from risking losing access to and control over the land on which they depend, deprivation of land due to LSAI has historically been a major trigger to conflict and outright civil war [8,80]. To fulfill human rights and enjoyment such as the right to food, the right to a livelihood, the right to housing, the right to property, and the right to development, the land is a crucial factor [21,78,[81][82][83][84]. The protection of land rights for smallholders and indigenous people has been recognized as part of the country's domestic law and international human rights instruments (FDREHPR, 1995, Arts.…”

Enriching perspectives: experienced ecosystem services in rural Mozambique and the importance of a gendered livelihood approach to resist reductionist analyses of local culture

“…In Baixo Limpopo, in 2012, a Chinese investor secured a land concession of 20,000 ha to produce rice (Porsani et al 2019). The territory of Nguava lies outside this concession, which allowed us to address the theme of livelihoods in general without having to focus on shocks caused by that project.…”