Livelihood Impacts of Large-Scale Agricultural Investments Using Empirical Evidence from Shashamane Rural District of Oromia Region, Ethiopia

Abstract

The impact of Large Scale Agricultural Investments (LSAI) on local people’s livelihood improvement has received less attention than it deserves in Ethiopia in general, and the Oromia regional states in particular. The main objective of this study was to analyze the impact of LSAI, which began operations in 2008, on 10,000 hectares of fertile land in the Shashamane rural district of Oromia region, Ethiopia to enhance the quality of life of the local people. A quasi-experimental study design strategy was used to achieve this goal. We obtained primary data from 300 households, comprising 134 treatment homes (households in a community with LSAI) from the Shashamane rural district and 166 control households (households in a community without LSAI) from the Shala district using systematic random sampling. Analysis was undertaken using principal component analysis (PCA) and propensity score matching (PSM). The Sustainable Livelihoods Framework (SLF) was used to examine the theoretical concept with empirical findings. According to the Average Treatment Effect on Treated (ATT) results, the treated households’ natural, human, and financial capital were −0.91, −0.81, and −0.15 less than control families, respectively. Loss of household livelihoods has deepened and exacerbated local poverty. Businesses have not mechanized and controlled these sizable portions of the parcel; instead, peasants have worked on them and exploited the idle parcel. The research suggests that the government’s pro-LSAI investment policy is desirable. However, weak institutional frameworks for protecting local people’s livelihoods as well as LSAI malpractice and the lack of continuous follow-up are causing the LSAI policy to fail. To mitigate the negative impact of LSAI on peasants, it is necessary to consider the local people’s livelihoods, responsive institutions, and accountable ventures.

Impact Assessment of Farmland Lease-Out on Rural Households’ Livelihood Capital and Livelihood Strategy

“…Third, these results provide new insights into how farmland lease-out affects rural household livelihood, and therefore complements the former conclusions that farmland lease affects livelihood [58][59][60]. This study contributes to the literature by improving our understanding of the influence of land on the livelihood framework.…”

Sustainable Livelihood Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Rural Households: A Case Study of Beijing Ecological Conservation Areas

“…The schemes for determining the index weight can be roughly divided into two categories. One is the subjective weighting method that usually involves the Delphi method [41] and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [42], which reflects the preference of decision makers or experts based on facts and experience; the other is the objective weighting method, such as the entropy weight method [43] and principal component analysis (PCA) [44]. They reveal the internal operating mechanism of indicators using scientific calculations.…”

Assessment of Irrigated Wheat Production in Western Oromia, Ethiopia: The Case Constraints and Swot Analysis

“…The crop production is mainly dependent on rain-fedsubsistence agriculture like maize, tef, sorghum, wheat, barley, faba bean, field pea, nug and sesame are the principal crops farmed in the areas. The study zones have a river potential for irrigation like Baro, Gibe, dhidhessa, etc., which are more potential for large-scale irrigation systems 26,30,32 .…”

“…This small-scale irrigation area of lower than 200 hectares 24,25 . Oromia is one of the largest regional states in the country concerning arable land and practices irrigated wheat production 17,26,27 . Based on the land and water potential the government is highly given priority for lowland and midland irrigated wheat production in the region.…”