2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03109.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laryngeal mask airways – to inflate or to deflate after insertion?

Abstract: This study demonstrates that LMAs, particularly when using small-sized LMAs or LMAs with a more rigid PVC surface, need to be deflated following insertion of the device rather than inflated to avoid cuff hyperinflation. Hence, cuff pressures should be measured routinely using a manometer to minimize potential pressure-related airway complications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding of higher cuff pressures in larger LMAs is somewhat surprising given previous studies to the contrary [13,14]. Von Ungern-Sternberg et al conducted a similar study in which they found intracuff pressures to be significantly higher in size 1 LMAs when compared to all other sizes [13]. Similarly, Wallace et al plotted pressure volume curves for pediatric LMAs and described a particularly steep curve for size 1 LMAs [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our finding of higher cuff pressures in larger LMAs is somewhat surprising given previous studies to the contrary [13,14]. Von Ungern-Sternberg et al conducted a similar study in which they found intracuff pressures to be significantly higher in size 1 LMAs when compared to all other sizes [13]. Similarly, Wallace et al plotted pressure volume curves for pediatric LMAs and described a particularly steep curve for size 1 LMAs [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…The results of this quality assurance study indicate a significant number of hyperinflated LMAs in our pediatric population, especially in larger sized LMAs. Our finding of higher cuff pressures in larger LMAs is somewhat surprising given previous studies to the contrary [13,14]. Von Ungern-Sternberg et al conducted a similar study in which they found intracuff pressures to be significantly higher in size 1 LMAs when compared to all other sizes [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 34%
“…Outcomes measured were airway leak pressure, ease and time for insertion, fibreoptic examination, incidence of gastric insufflation and complications. Median (IQR [range]) time to successful device placement was faster with the air-Q SP (12 (10-15 [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18])) s than with the LMA-Unique (14 (12-17 [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]) s; p = 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the air-Q SP and LMA-Unique in initial airway leak pressures (16 (14-18 [10- …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in airway leak pressure of both devices at 10 min may indicate some degree of moulding of the device in the posterior pharynx improving airway seal. Adjustments of the intracuff pressure are sometimes needed to maintain an adequate airway seal and prevent overinflation of the cuff when using supraglottic airways [20][21][22]. In this respect, the use of the air-Q SP may represent a benefit, as it may be more convenient than supraglottic airways with inflatable cuffs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, cuff pressures should be measured routinely using a manometer to minimize potential pressure-related airway complications. [7] Joshi et al . showed that the ability to generate airway pressure of 20 cmH2O and ability to ventilate manually is a good test compared to fiberoptic bronchoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%