2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.11.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser-assisted atom probe tomography investigation of magnetic FePt nanoclusters: First experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Encapsulation of nanoparticles deposited on a flat substrate and FIB lift-out allowed improving the data quality, but have been implemented so far in a few instances only. [23][24][25][26][27] In this study, we show that IGC is actually an efficient method for the manufacturing of identical nanoparticle-containing specimens intended for HR-STEM/EDX and APT analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…22 Encapsulation of nanoparticles deposited on a flat substrate and FIB lift-out allowed improving the data quality, but have been implemented so far in a few instances only. [23][24][25][26][27] In this study, we show that IGC is actually an efficient method for the manufacturing of identical nanoparticle-containing specimens intended for HR-STEM/EDX and APT analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…They are generally incompatible with analysis by APT because the NPs are either too small to be individually transplanted and sharpened into an APT specimen, or because empty, voided regions contained within groups of NPs, or other open-space structures, are distributed in such a way that an APT tip cannot be made without being compromised by these structural defects (Larson et al, 2015). A few specimen preparation strategies have been reported in the literature (Folcke et al, 2012; Greene et al, 2012; Gordon et al, 2013; Felfer et al, 2014, 2015; Heck et al, 2014; Larson et al, 2015; Perea et al, 2016), but we will focus on two general strategies in this review.…”
Section: Other Preparation Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first strategy takes sub-monolayer deposits of particles on a substrate and covers them with a matrix or capping material (deposit and cover) (Folcke et al, 2012; Heck et al, 2014; Felfer et al, 2015). This covering process can include methods such as atomic layer deposition (ALD), where a space-filling structure is grown around deposited or grown NPs (Larson et al, 2015).…”
Section: Other Preparation Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can be summed up into two groups, namely those based on electrophoresis of nanoparticles onto pre-sharpened tips ready for APT analyses (Tedsree et al, 2011; Yu et al, 2012; Li et al, 2014) and those based on embedding nanoparticles in a medium followed by focused-ion-beam (FIB) milling of the composite material to APT specimens. To embed the nanoparticles in a metallic matrix, electron beam-assisted Pt deposition (Xiang et al, 2013; Yang et al, 2015), sputter deposition (Folcke et al, 2012; Felfer et al, 2014), and the usage of low-melting-point fusible alloys (Kim et al, 2019) have been proposed. Although these recent attempts have proved to be clearly applicable to specific material systems, further developments in the preparation techniques for APT specimens are still needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%