2015
DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2015/1385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser Assisted Sub Epithelial Keratectomy for Hyperopia Using 213 Nm Wavelength Solid State Laser, 3 Year Follow Up Study of Refractive and Visual Outcomes

Abstract: PURPOSE:To evaluate the visual and refractive outcomes, using 213 nm solid lasers for the correction of broad range of hyperopia, covering pediatric age group to presbyopic age group. MATERIALS AND METHODS:The Present study is a prospective case series in a private practice setup, analysed series of eyes, with low to high hyperopia, who underwent conventional LASEK. Long term (3 year) visual and refractive outcomes and overall patient satisfaction studied. RESULTS: This cohort study of 37 eyes included broad r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Autrata R et al [ 18 ], after 2 years of follow-up, 86% of patients in the PRK group showed an emmetropia of ±1.00 D interval and 57% SE of ±0.5 D in their eyes. In the studies by Kaluzny BJ et al [ 13 ] and Yenugandula R et al [ 21 ] (after 3 years), 78% and 92% of the eyes were in the range of ±0.5 and ±0.1.00 D, respectively. Also, in a study by El-Agha MS et al [ 4 ], in the PRK group, after one year, 83.3% and 100% of the eyes had an SE of ±0.5 D and ±1.00 D, respectively, which was not in line with our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Autrata R et al [ 18 ], after 2 years of follow-up, 86% of patients in the PRK group showed an emmetropia of ±1.00 D interval and 57% SE of ±0.5 D in their eyes. In the studies by Kaluzny BJ et al [ 13 ] and Yenugandula R et al [ 21 ] (after 3 years), 78% and 92% of the eyes were in the range of ±0.5 and ±0.1.00 D, respectively. Also, in a study by El-Agha MS et al [ 4 ], in the PRK group, after one year, 83.3% and 100% of the eyes had an SE of ±0.5 D and ±1.00 D, respectively, which was not in line with our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preoperative UCVA in the PRK group increased from mean LogMAR of 0.37±0.28 to mean LogMAR of 0.03±0.11 at 6 months postop [ 19 ]. Furthermore, UCVA ≥20/20 was observed in 59% of eyes at the 3 years postop [ 13 ] and vision ≥20/40 was observed in 78.4% of the eyes at the 3 years postop [ 21 ]. In O'Brart DP et al study [ 10 ], the UCVA ≥20/20 and ≥20/40 was observed in 15% and 57.5% of the eyes, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%