2016
DOI: 10.1364/ol.41.002342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser damage growth with picosecond pulses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have investigated the growth behavior of laser damage sites on HR mirrors at the wavelength of 1.030µm in the sub-picosecond pulse duration regime. We confirm that damage areas evolve linearly with the number of shots as follow 0 n S n S α = × + as shown in [14]. The growth coefficient α is proportional to the fluence and is modified by the polarization of the incoming beam.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have investigated the growth behavior of laser damage sites on HR mirrors at the wavelength of 1.030µm in the sub-picosecond pulse duration regime. We confirm that damage areas evolve linearly with the number of shots as follow 0 n S n S α = × + as shown in [14]. The growth coefficient α is proportional to the fluence and is modified by the polarization of the incoming beam.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This linear growth evolves as 0 n S n S α = × + , where 0 S and n S are the initial damage area and the damage area after n laser pulses, respectively. α is the linear growth coefficient, increasing with the fluence set during growth sequence [14]. In this work, we investigate more deeply the growth behavior in the sub-picosecond regime in an attempt to identify the physical phenomena in place during growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the ISO standard, 20 it corresponds to the energy density at the top of the Gaussian transverse beam intensity profile, and we calculate it as the ratio of the total energy in the beam to the effective beam area (set as the area at 1∕e for a Gaussian beam). 21 In all cases in Fig. 8, the transition of the damage probability from 1 to 0 is very sharp, indicating that the damage is primarily intrinsic, governed by the coating materials' electronic properties rather than by structural or nanoscale defects in the coating.…”
Section: Lidt Tests Of the Bbhr Coating Of Run 072mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…For ps and sub-ps pulses, coating defects play a role in nonpropagating damage behavior to a lesser extent or not at all, 21,25 and propagating damage primarily results from intrinsic damage mechanisms based on direct interaction of the laser radiation with the coating layer materials. Figure 12 shows the 800-and 8-ps pulse NIF-MEL LIDT results in the form of a plot of cumulative number of nonpropagating damage sites versus fluence, with arrows indicating the fluences at which propagating damage occurs.…”
Section: Lidt Tests Of the Bbhr Coating Of Run 071mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density of growing damage sites is in fact the main parameter that must be evaluated to qualify an Continued on next page 10.1117/2.1201607.006548 Page 2/3 optical component. 5 The bandgap of the material ultimately limits the damage threshold (and bandgap and refractive index are interrelated). Thus, there is also a clear correlation between the refractive index and the LIDT 6 (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Laurent Gallaismentioning
confidence: 99%