2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2009.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser-optical path to nuclear energy without radioactivity: Fusion of hydrogen–boron by nonlinear force driven plasma blocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it seems unreachable with conventional fusion approaches because it requires a very high temperature1, and consequently a very high laser energy, and it seems difficult to achieve a positive energy balance taking into account the nuclear energy release and the radiation losses2. Radically different approaches and schemes must be sought34. Taking advantage of the fast evolution of the short, high-intensity lasers5, we proposed a new scheme6 based on fusion reactions initiated by a laser-accelerated proton beam78 and we demonstrated its high efficiency compared to previous approaches910.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it seems unreachable with conventional fusion approaches because it requires a very high temperature1, and consequently a very high laser energy, and it seems difficult to achieve a positive energy balance taking into account the nuclear energy release and the radiation losses2. Radically different approaches and schemes must be sought34. Taking advantage of the fast evolution of the short, high-intensity lasers5, we proposed a new scheme6 based on fusion reactions initiated by a laser-accelerated proton beam78 and we demonstrated its high efficiency compared to previous approaches910.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any hope of this reaction was excluded by using the thermal equilibrium conditions of spherical laser compression and ignition which turned out to be about 100,000 times more difficult than the DT reaction (Moses 2008(Moses , 2010. When using the here explained nonlinear force block generation for side-on ignition of uncompressed fuel, it turned out (Hora et al 2009a) that the ignition is less than by a factor ten than for DT. We mention the following new results for other fusion reactions where primarily no neutrons are generated as in the case of HB11 giving the threshold ps ignition energy flux density E * th and the ignition temperature T * in the reaction front generated within about a nanosecond a stationary value to confirm ignition.…”
Section: Fusion Energy Without Dangerous Radioactivitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…DT E * th = 4.7 × 10 8 J/cm 2 T * = 7.2 keV (Hora et al 2008;Hora 2009) p-11 B E * th = 1.5 × 10 9 J/cm 2 T * = 87 keV (Hora et al 2009a(Hora et al , 2009b p-7 Li E * th = 2.5 × 10 9 J/cm 2 T * = 69 keV 3 He-3 He E * th = 2.7 × 10 9 J/cm 2 T * = 88 keV All hydrodynamic computations of the kind of Chu (1972) automatically included the bremsstrahlung emission to be then less than the gained fusion energy for incident energy flux densities E * above the here given threshold values. A decrease of E * th and of T * was relatively large if the inhibition factor for the reduction of the thermal conductivity due to electric double layers (Hora et al 1984) in the extreme inhomogeneous plasma, and if the Gabor collective model was used for DT.…”
Section: Fusion Energy Without Dangerous Radioactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computations for non-thermal equilibrium conditions of laser ignition of solid state fusion targets were performed [24][25] with the result that for DT fusion, an irradiated energy density within one picosecond had to have an energy flux threshold in the range of few times of R = 10 8 J/cm 2 had to initiate the fusion flame for the reaction in the uncompressed solid density fusion fuel the for plane wave front and target geometry. These computations had to be updated in view of collective collisions and inhibition of thermal conduction due to double layer effects [26] [27]. When instead of DT the fusion reaction cross section of HB11 were used [28][29], the energy flux threshold R arrived in the same range R. This was the surprising result for HB11 compared with DT that the ignition had an increase of the fusion condition fife orders of magnitudes higher against the classical value at thermal equilibrium.…”
Section: Aneutronic Clean Boron Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%