2004
DOI: 10.1007/bf02428177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser surface-contouring and spline data-smoothing for residual stress measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
110
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
110
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimum knot spacing was selected by calculating stresses for spacings of 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm, 5 mm, and 6 mm. An error was determined by comparison of the stress at each node to that of a coarser spacing, following the methodology detailed by Prime et al (2004).…”
Section: The Contour Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimum knot spacing was selected by calculating stresses for spacings of 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm, 5 mm, and 6 mm. An error was determined by comparison of the stress at each node to that of a coarser spacing, following the methodology detailed by Prime et al (2004).…”
Section: The Contour Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contour method requires clamping of both sides of the specimen securely and symmetrically about the cut plane, to prevent movement of the component as stresses relax during cutting. In addition secure and symmetrical clamping reduces cutting induced plasticity and reduces the elastic cut tip deformation error, which is called the "bulge error" (Prime et al, 2004;Prime and DeWald, 2013).…”
Section: The Contour Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tee-join welded [56,57], quenched and impacted thick plates [58], cold-expanded hole [43] and aluminium alloy forging [8]. It offers improvements over conventional relaxation methods of measuring residual stresses [59,60].…”
Section: Contour Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was first published in detail in 2001, where the contour method was numerically verified by 2D finite element (FE) simulation and experimentally validated on a bent steel beam having a known residual stress distribution [60]. The potential of the contour method was later demonstrated on a 12-pass TIG BS4360 steel weld to measure a complex 2D stress variation across the weld section [56]. The result obtained from the contour method was in excellent quantitative agreement with the outcome measured by a completely different technique non destructive neutron diffraction.…”
Section: Contour Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contour method of residual stress measurement is a relatively new method that, whilst destructive, has significant advantages over many other techniques [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. A stressed component is cut into two parts using wire electro-discharge machining (WEDM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%