2019
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.1056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lasofoxifene as a potential treatment for ER+ metastatic breast cancer.

Abstract: 1056 Background: Estrogen receptor positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancers (MBC) that express constitutively active somatic ESR1 mutations at Y537S and D538G allow tumors to progress in the presence of approved endocrine therapies. For patients with ER+ MBC, fulvestrant is the first line of treatment. Palbociclib or other CDK4/6 inhibitors are now being included. Preliminary studies show that lasofoxifene, a selective ERα modulator (SERM), was effective in reducing tumor growth in an endocrine resistant xeno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the LBD mutations reduce the potency of fulvestrant (Toy et al, 2017), next-generation oral SERMs or SERDs that target both WT and mutant ER are in clinical development (Table 2) (Fanning and Greene, 2019). For example, GDC-9545 and elacestrant are oral SERDs that have shown preliminary clinical activity in ESR1-mutant MBCs, some of which had progressed on prior SERDs; these agents demonstrated acceptable toxicity profiles (Jhaveri et al, 2020;Kaklamani et al, 2020).…”
Section: Alterations In Er and Aromatasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the LBD mutations reduce the potency of fulvestrant (Toy et al, 2017), next-generation oral SERMs or SERDs that target both WT and mutant ER are in clinical development (Table 2) (Fanning and Greene, 2019). For example, GDC-9545 and elacestrant are oral SERDs that have shown preliminary clinical activity in ESR1-mutant MBCs, some of which had progressed on prior SERDs; these agents demonstrated acceptable toxicity profiles (Jhaveri et al, 2020;Kaklamani et al, 2020).…”
Section: Alterations In Er and Aromatasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a recent study suggests that fulvestrant and similar ER antagonists suppress ER activity primarily by impairing intra-nuclear ER mobility (Figure 1D) (Guan et al, 2019). A number of oral SERDs, with potentially better pharmacological properties than fulvestrant, are being developed (Fanning and Greene, 2019). In this review, we summarize mechanisms associated with and/or causal to resistance to estrogen suppression, or inactivation of ER by other means (SERMs/SERDs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last, information on individual tumor genomic alterations provides the opportunity for patients to participate in molecular-and genetic-driven clinical trials-for instance, multiple clinical trials are ongoing for ESR1mutated breast cancer. 51,52 CLINICAL DETECTION OF GENOMIC ALTERATIONS 53 It is also important to recognize that targeted therapies that are beneficial in a particular disease may not translate to other disease sites.…”
Section: Microsatellite Instability and Tumor Mutational Burdenmentioning
confidence: 99%