2022 IEEE 19th Annual Consumer Communications &Amp; Networking Conference (CCNC) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/ccnc49033.2022.9700582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latency and network aware placement for cloud-native 5G/6G services

Abstract: To meet ever more stringent requirements in terms of latency, 5G/6G networks are evolving from centralized to distributed architectures, for which the cloud-native paradigm with services decomposed into microservices is utmost relevant. This in turn raises the issue related to the distribution of network functions. In this paper, we introduce a novel microservice placement strategy considering the internal service composition, notably the communication between microservices. We formulate the placement as an op… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Integer linear programming (ILP) [22][23][24][25][26][27] Mixed integer linear programming (MILP) [28][29][30][31][32][33] Heuristic method 23,24,26,27,29,[31][32][33] Machine learning (ML) [34][35][36][37][38] Instead, heuristics (e.g., greedy algorithms) and meta-heuristics produce comparatively faster but suboptimal results that usually achieve less objectives (e.g., low response time or reduced communication delay or load balancing or limited energy consumption). On the other hand, ML-based approaches (e.g., genetic algorithm and ant colony) are known to be more accurate solutions 34 thanks to their interactive learning and decision making abilities.…”
Section: Methods Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Integer linear programming (ILP) [22][23][24][25][26][27] Mixed integer linear programming (MILP) [28][29][30][31][32][33] Heuristic method 23,24,26,27,29,[31][32][33] Machine learning (ML) [34][35][36][37][38] Instead, heuristics (e.g., greedy algorithms) and meta-heuristics produce comparatively faster but suboptimal results that usually achieve less objectives (e.g., low response time or reduced communication delay or load balancing or limited energy consumption). On the other hand, ML-based approaches (e.g., genetic algorithm and ant colony) are known to be more accurate solutions 34 thanks to their interactive learning and decision making abilities.…”
Section: Methods Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, MLbased approaches (e.g., genetic algorithm, ant colony) are known to be more accurate solutions [33] thanks to their interactive learning and decision making abilities. [21][22][23][24][25][26] Mixed Interger Linear Programming (MILP) [27][28][29][30][31][32] Heuristic Method [22,23,25,26,28,[30][31][32]] Machine Learning (ML) [33][34][35][36][37] As detailed in Table 2, the above container placement strategies can be further categorized based on target architecture (cloud, fog, edge), type of placement (static versus dynamic), key objectives, algorithm to solve and evaluation method. In the case of static placement, an initial placement is typically proposed only once (at start).…”
Section: Container Placement Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several learning-based mechanisms to reduce latency have been proposed for 6G networks, often including computation as well: the placement of computation tasks and network functions is critical for reducing latency in complex tasks [109], and the joint consideration of computational and communication aspects can lead to lower overall latency for different services [110]. Domains that have strict constraints and high throughput, such as VR transmission [111], or fast mobility, such as vehicular communications [112], pose specific challenges that need to be addressed individually.…”
Section: A Latencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the distribution of the relevant network functions is important. In [ 41 ], the authors describe a microservice placement strategy, starting from the internal service composition to the particular communication model which is established between microservices. They regard the placement as an optimization problem with the aim of minimizing the end-to-end service latency.…”
Section: Relevant Existing Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%