2015
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyv096.452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latent TB Infection and Blood Borne Viruses in a London Prison: A Cross Sectional Survey.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence observed in this study (51.7%) was different from the prevalence of LTI among the general population as noted by the WHO, which estimates it around 30% [3], as well as by a study carried out in the general Ethiopia population which estimates it around 46% [21] and congruent with pastoral communities in Southern part of Ethiopia (50.5%) [22]. In our findings the prevalence of LTBI were markedly higher than the prevalence in prisons of countries like USA (6.3%) [23]; UK (11.5%) [24], (7.1%) [25]; Australia (14.0%) [26]; Italy PLOS ONE (17.9%) [27]; Canada (32.3%) [28]; Spain (40.3%) [29]; Switzerland (46.9%) [30] and Minas Gerais (25.2%) [31]. The probable explanation for this difference might be due to the variation of study population from high-income countries, a prison environment in a country of low TB incidence, more efficient TB control programs both inside and outside prisons and prisonbased TB screening programs in these countries than in Ethiopia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The prevalence observed in this study (51.7%) was different from the prevalence of LTI among the general population as noted by the WHO, which estimates it around 30% [3], as well as by a study carried out in the general Ethiopia population which estimates it around 46% [21] and congruent with pastoral communities in Southern part of Ethiopia (50.5%) [22]. In our findings the prevalence of LTBI were markedly higher than the prevalence in prisons of countries like USA (6.3%) [23]; UK (11.5%) [24], (7.1%) [25]; Australia (14.0%) [26]; Italy PLOS ONE (17.9%) [27]; Canada (32.3%) [28]; Spain (40.3%) [29]; Switzerland (46.9%) [30] and Minas Gerais (25.2%) [31]. The probable explanation for this difference might be due to the variation of study population from high-income countries, a prison environment in a country of low TB incidence, more efficient TB control programs both inside and outside prisons and prisonbased TB screening programs in these countries than in Ethiopia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Comparatively similar studies were reported from southern Ethiopia (50.5%) by Teklu et al 58 and outside Ethiopia such as Spain (54.6%). 59 However, the magnitude of LTBI in prisons were markedly higher than the prevalence reported in the United States (6.3%), 60 the United Kingdom (11.5%), 61 Brazil (25.2%), 62 and Canada (32.3%). 63 Moreover, the magnitude was lower than studies conducted in previous reports among prisoners in Colombia (67.6%), 64 and Malaysia (88.8%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%