Lateral Transfer of Organic Carbon and Phosphorus by Water Erosion at Hillslope Scale in Southern Spain Olive Orchards

Abstract

Core Ideas A 3‐yr hillslope study presents DOC, DOC, TP, and DRP losses from several olive orchards. Losses of DOC and TOC were higher than those measured in other agricultural systems. Losses of TP were at the high‐end range of losses measured in agricultural systems. Temporary cover crops in lanes can reduce TOC and TP losses through reduced sediment losses. Cover crops did not significantly reduce DOC and DRP in runoff compared with conventional tillage. Dissolved organic C (DOC) and dissolved reactive P (DRP) in runoff and total organic C (TOC) and total P (TP) in sediment were measured in three olive (Olea europaea L.) orchards, during a 3‐yr runoff plot experiment under two soil management systems (temporary cover crop in lanes [CC]; conventional tillage [CT]). Losses of DOC (7.8–13.6 kg ha−1 yr−1) were equivalent and losses of TOC (101–432 kg ha−1 yr−1) were higher than those measured in other agricultural systems, so both sources of organic C, dissolved and in sediment, should not be neglected when accounting fluxes to water bodies in the region and soil organic C (SOC) balances at the hillslope scale in olive orchards. Losses of DRP (0.03–0.21 kg ha−1 yr−1) were in the lower to medium range, while losses of TP (2–39 kg ha−1 yr−1) were in the higher range than those reported from agricultural areas. The average annual concentration of DOC in runoff was similar for both systems (20.9–9.1 vs. 21.4–8.7 mL L−1 for CC and CT, respectively) and also for DRP (0.45–0.02 vs. 0.20–0.02 mg L−1 for CC and CT, respectively). Concentrations of TOC and TP were higher under CC, but under CC the TOC and TP fluxes were lower because of reduced sediment losses. To achieve a large reduction in TP and TOC, CC management should provide early ground cover beginning in early fall, the start of the rainy season. A conceptual model of TOC and TP losses was developed to estimate the impact of different cover crop soil conservation strategies.

Effectiveness of Cover Crops to Reduce Loss of Soil Organic Matter in a Rainfed Vineyard

“…7.8 kg DOC ha −1 yr −1 ) and lower than the losses of total organic carbon (ca. 101 kg TOC ha −1 yr −1 ) measured by Gómez et al [46] in Spanish olive orchard plots with CC. Besides, these authors also reported clear benefits on reducing the loss of carbon in those plots with CC compared with the plots under CT.…”

Sustainability by Function (SbF): A Case Study in a Rainfed Vineyard to Reduce the Loss of Soil Nutrients

“…In farmland with annual crops, conservation tillage (reduced/no-tillage with/out residues) is beneficial to the improvement of integrated soil fertility and crop yield [21]. In permanent crops (e.g., vineyards, olive groves and other fruit-tree orchards), the use of ground covers (e.g., spontaneous vegetation, seeded permanent/temporary cover crop (CC), mulching and agro-textile) has demonstrated its effectiveness to reduce runoff yield, increase surface water infiltration [22] and minimize the loss of soil [23], soil organic matter [13], soil organic carbon [14] and nutrients [24].…”

Ecosystem services provision by gully control. A review

“…Expansion of the drainage network and development of gullies Nyssen et al, 2004;Palacio Prieto and López Blanco, 1994;Vandekerckhove et al, 2001;Ries and Marzolff, 2003 Rise in agricultural costs Valentin et al, 2005;Santos Telles et al, 2011;Panagos et al, 2018 "Off site" effects Reference Silting-up of reservoirs and loss of functionality Poesen et al, 2002;de Vente et al, 2005;Haregeweyn et al, 2003;Valentin et al, 2005;Haregeweyn et al, 2008 Increment in floods Poesen and Hooke, 1997;Martineli Costa and Prado Bacellar, 2007;Obi Lawrence, 2017. Contamination of soils and surface waters Toy et al, 2002;Gómez et al, 2017;Issaka and Ashraf, 2017.…”