2019
DOI: 10.32992/erlacs.10564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latin America’s changing balance of class forces: An Introduction

Abstract: In this introductory article, we present the special collection by outlining the shared theoretical underpinnings of our attempt to understand the current crisis of the left in Latin America. Challenging state-centred perspectives that overemphasize state autonomy and the role of charismatic leaders, we propose a relational approach, one that focuses on the interactions between governments, popular movements, and elites. While acknowledging the importance of international economic and geopolitical tendencies, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanisms that led to improvements in income distribution also proved unsustainable, partly for economic, but mainly for political reasons. The means introduced failed to produce positive feedback effects and long-term reforms and, in some cases, created strong opposition among elites (Chiasson-LeBel and Larrabure, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms that led to improvements in income distribution also proved unsustainable, partly for economic, but mainly for political reasons. The means introduced failed to produce positive feedback effects and long-term reforms and, in some cases, created strong opposition among elites (Chiasson-LeBel and Larrabure, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practical and ideological differences between these models, the extent to which each diverges from or repackages neoliberal doctrine, and their relevance since the “return of the Right” (Frens-String and Velasco, 2016) provoke contentious debate (Chiasson-LeBel and Larraburre, 2019; Mirowski, Plehwe, and Slobodian, 2020; Pickup, 2019). Rather than address these discussions, we highlight their unifying assertion: amidst Latin America’s political upheaval, extractivism remains hegemonic, cutting across geography, party politics, development ideologies, and private and public sector interests (Artiga-Purcell, 2022b).…”
Section: Disaster Extractivism and Shock Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%