Latin America: The Second Stage of Reform

Naím, Moisés

doi:10.1353/jod.1994.0057

Cited by 140 publications

(51 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the first, neoliberalism was conceived as a debt management strategy that effectively discredited the state-led model of development in the aftermath of the 1982 debt crisis. Then, by the 1990s, a second wave of complex reforms in the economy was being introduced, in which privatisation of public services and trade liberalisation became the battlecry of reformers in Latin America (Naím, 1994). Although the timing of market reforms varies across Africa and Asia, we can nonetheless still talk about a global shift from state-led economic governance towards 'deep marketisation' across the Global South (Campbell, 2009;Carroll, 2010;Harrison, 2010 ;Soederberg et al, 2006).…”

Section: Neoliberalism In the Resource Sectormentioning

confidence: 99%

Resource Governance and Developmental States in the Global South

Singh¹

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The global political economy is in flux as a series of cumulative crises impacts its organization and governance. The IPE series has tracked its development in both analysis and structure over the last three decades. It has always had a concentration on the global South. Now the South increasingly challenges the North as the centre of development, also reflected in a growing number of submissions and publications on indebted Eurozone economies in Southern Europe.An indispensable resource for scholars and researchers, the series examines a variety of capitalisms and connections by focusing on emerging economies, companies and sectors, debates and policies. It informs diverse policy communities as the established trans-Atlantic North declines and 'the rest', especially the BRICS, rise.

show abstract

Section: Neoliberalism In the Resource Sectormentioning

confidence: 99%

Resource Governance and Developmental States in the Global South

Singh¹

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…From the mid-1990s onward, a variety of policy themes, ranging from the notion of second stage reforms (Naim 1994) to calls for revising the Washington Consensus (Burki and Perry 1998) and a growing interest in good governance (Kaufmann et al 1999), converged on the idea that liberalizing countries should complement policy change with the pursuit of market-supporting institutions. By the turn of the century, official development advice came to be centered around the promises of comprehensive institutional reforms (World Bank 2002).…”

Section: Institutional Persistence and Change In Late Developersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reforming Sticky Institutions: Persistence and Change in Turkish Agriculture

Güven

2009

St Comp Int Dev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The recent revival of interest in institutions in development studies favors the analysis of macroinstitutions and questions of institutional origination and change. But a strong emphasis on mid-range, sectoral arrangements, and a refined notion of continuity, can also improve our understanding of institutions in late developers-one by facilitating a thick view of institutions while offering a sharp perspective on the current institutional reform agenda, and the other by casting new light on instances of irregular change and failed or partial reform. The trajectory of Turkey's agricultural support regime is used as a case to substantiate this argument. Building on an analytic distinction between resilience and persistence, the article explains the dynamic continuity of populist-corporatist forms of market governance in Turkish agriculture, despite the neoliberalism of the 1980s and 1990s and radical institutional reform efforts of the 2000s.

show abstract

“…Rather, smaller groups of firms-often single firms-were more likely to lobby the state directly for specific objectives (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 1999). Risk, 1990Risk, -2002 more technical skill (see, for example, Naím, 1994;and Krueger, 2000). More important, the number of interests potentially affected in second-generation reforms is much larger; consequently, groups representing these interests are often far more vocal (Tommasi and Velasco, 1996).…”

Section: Political Constraints and Public Support For Market Reformmentioning

confidence: 99%