Contextual discrimination, or the specific conditions under which judicial injustice manifests itself, has become an important concept for disentangling the complex interplay between legal and extralegal variables and their effects on sentencing outcomes. Previous studies show evidence for contextual discrimination in felony sentencing. This study provides evidence through descriptive and multivariate analyses of contextual discrimination in misdemeanor sentencing. Small, yet significant direct discrimination against non-Whites was observed. At the same time, the findings showed that Whites received more severe senDr. Ed A. Muñoz is a Criminal Justice Department faculty member and the Director of Chicano Studies at the University of Wyoming. In general, his research expertise deals with the Latin experience in the midwestern United States. His primary research is the investigation of racial/ethnic disparities in misdemeanor and felony sentencing decisions in rural Nebraska jurisdictions. Future projects include the investigation of how context and culture affect Mexican American family and individual physical and mental health.Stephen G. Sapp, PhD, is Associate Professor of Sociology at Iowa State University. He conducts research on community, gender issues, and risk theory. Recently, he has examined determinants of small business success in rural and urban areas and public responses to complex and controversial innovations. tences when convicted for more serious offenses. Several explanations for this finding are discussed as they relate to contextual discrimination. The findings indicate that more research is needed on the effects of contextual discrimination in felony and misdemeanor sentencing disparities.