“…Despite the capabilities of some of these analytical schemes to deal with complex geometries (Korobkin, 2006) and flexible bodies (Tassin et al, 2013;Qin and Batra, 2009), numerical models are foreseen to be preferred (Hirdaris and Temarel, 2009;Kapsenberg, 2011;Hughes et al, 2013) for their accuracy and versatility. Thus, many numerical models have been proposed for the analysis of water entry problems, ranging from traditional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solvers (Colicchio et al, 2006;Sun and Faltinsen, 2006;Das and Batra, 2011) to meshless methods (Oger et al, 2006;Shao, 2009;Gong et al, 2009;Panciroli et al, 2012) and lattice Boltzmann solvers (De Rosis et al, 2014;Zarghami et al, 2014). The main challenges in the numerical analysis of water entry problems are associated with the impulsive nature of the impact, which may lead to large numerical oscillations (Hirsch, 2007), and the existence of a free surface, whose motion must be correctly tracked by the numerical solver.…”