1977
DOI: 10.2320/jinstmet1952.41.12_1207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lattice Diffusion and Grain Boundary Diffusion of Copper in γ-Iron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4. As can be seen, the calculated results agree well with the measured experimental data by Speich et al, [36] Rothman et al, [37] Salje and Feller-Kniepmeier, [38] Majima and Mitani, [39] and Taguchi et al [40] Figure 5 shows the calculated tracer diffusion coefficients of Cu in fcc Cu-Fe alloys at different temperatures Fig. 2 Calculated thermodynamic factor (/) of the fcc phase in the Cu-Fe binary system using the data by Chen and Jin [50] Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4. As can be seen, the calculated results agree well with the measured experimental data by Speich et al, [36] Rothman et al, [37] Salje and Feller-Kniepmeier, [38] Majima and Mitani, [39] and Taguchi et al [40] Figure 5 shows the calculated tracer diffusion coefficients of Cu in fcc Cu-Fe alloys at different temperatures Fig. 2 Calculated thermodynamic factor (/) of the fcc phase in the Cu-Fe binary system using the data by Chen and Jin [50] Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] The calculated results are in good agreement with the experimental data measured by Mackliet, [28] Mullen, [29] Barreu et al, [30] Bernardini and Cabane, [31] Sen et al, [32] Salje and Feller-Kniepmeier, [33] and Almazouzi et al, [34] but show obvious deviation from the experimental data by Tomono and Ikushima. [35] Comparison between the calculated impurity diffusion coefficients of Cu in fcc Fe with the temperature dependence and the experimental data [36][37][38][39][40] is given in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The diffusion coefficients investigated The recommended values of Do and Q for austenitic iron are 0.43 x m2 s-l and 280 f 3 kJ mol-' respectively. Although there are some differences between the diffusion coefficients, obtained in the present research and those in previous studies, they are comparable.…”
Section: Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%