2010
DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2010.71.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lattice Dynamics from Force-Fields as a Technique for Mineral Physics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantum mechanical models allow probing of the physics of geomaterials at extreme geological conditions such as the conditions of temperatures well in excess of 3000 C and pressures in excess of 130 GPa pressure found deep in the earth. 3 The technique is ideally suited for supercomputer implementations as molecular dynamics has a long track record of at least 50 years in the area of condensed matter physics. In earth sciences the current status of these calculations is mainly limited to applications in mineralogy and nanochemistry, and the approach has not yet bridged the scales from thousands of atoms to describing the behaviour of larger rock specimens consisting of mineral aggregates.…”
Section: Microstructure Modelling Of Earth Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantum mechanical models allow probing of the physics of geomaterials at extreme geological conditions such as the conditions of temperatures well in excess of 3000 C and pressures in excess of 130 GPa pressure found deep in the earth. 3 The technique is ideally suited for supercomputer implementations as molecular dynamics has a long track record of at least 50 years in the area of condensed matter physics. In earth sciences the current status of these calculations is mainly limited to applications in mineralogy and nanochemistry, and the approach has not yet bridged the scales from thousands of atoms to describing the behaviour of larger rock specimens consisting of mineral aggregates.…”
Section: Microstructure Modelling Of Earth Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schreckenbach and Shamov [24] have recently discussed the various approximations used in computational chemistry of actinides. Due to the limitations of current functionals, DFT results will quantitatively differ from experimental results [25].…”
Section: Modeling Schemesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This limitation makes it difficult to model realistic surfaces and interfaces, which hold the key to ceramic dissolution processes. Gale and Wright [25] have pointed out that despite the ongoing increases in computational power many problems of interest continue to lie beyond the scope of DFT. Therefore, the main value of DFT in the study of ceramic waste forms lies in its ability to provide reliable data to fill gaps where experimental data is not available and to parameterize the next higher scale (coarser model) in the modeling hierarchy.…”
Section: Modeling Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 A major drawback of the BKS model is that the dispersive term coefficients are unphysically large and the partial charges used are too low. 40 By far the most serious shortcoming of BKS is that it leads to both coesite and stishovite being more stable than α-quartzthis can probably be attributed to the large dispersive term in the potential. 22,40 This is contrary to experiment as well as DFT studies (in the generalized gradient approximation) which predict α-quartz to be the most stable polymorph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 By far the most serious shortcoming of BKS is that it leads to both coesite and stishovite being more stable than α-quartzthis can probably be attributed to the large dispersive term in the potential. 22,40 This is contrary to experiment as well as DFT studies (in the generalized gradient approximation) which predict α-quartz to be the most stable polymorph. 12 BKS is also known to overestimate the transition pressure for the stishovite I → II transition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%