2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-0241-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lattice Functions and Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
64
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…These include: (a) Subsumptive general solutions, in which each of the variables is expressed as an interval by deriving successive conjunctive or disjunctive eliminants of the original function, (b) Parametric general solutions, in which each of the variables is expressed via arbitrary parameters which are freely chosen elements of the underlying Boolean algebra and (c) Particular solutions, each of which is an assignment from the underlying Boolean algebra to every pertinent variable that makes the Boolean equation an identity (Brown, 2003). The reconstructed function f (X) in every case is set in a canonical form, such as the complete-sum form (the Blake Canonical from) (Brown, 2003;Rudeanu, 1974;2001;Blake, 1938;Tison, 1967;Reusch, 1975;Cutler et al, 1979;Muroga, 1979;Gregg, 1998;Rushdi and Al-Yahya, 2001;Rushdi, 2001b), to facilitate proving its equivalence to the original function. The methods presented herein are a mixture of purely-algebraic methods and map methods that utilize the variableentered Karnaugh map (Rushdi, 1983;1985;1986;1987;1997;2001a;2004;Rushdi and Amashah, 2011;Rushdi and Al-Yahya, 2000a;2000b;2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These include: (a) Subsumptive general solutions, in which each of the variables is expressed as an interval by deriving successive conjunctive or disjunctive eliminants of the original function, (b) Parametric general solutions, in which each of the variables is expressed via arbitrary parameters which are freely chosen elements of the underlying Boolean algebra and (c) Particular solutions, each of which is an assignment from the underlying Boolean algebra to every pertinent variable that makes the Boolean equation an identity (Brown, 2003). The reconstructed function f (X) in every case is set in a canonical form, such as the complete-sum form (the Blake Canonical from) (Brown, 2003;Rudeanu, 1974;2001;Blake, 1938;Tison, 1967;Reusch, 1975;Cutler et al, 1979;Muroga, 1979;Gregg, 1998;Rushdi and Al-Yahya, 2001;Rushdi, 2001b), to facilitate proving its equivalence to the original function. The methods presented herein are a mixture of purely-algebraic methods and map methods that utilize the variableentered Karnaugh map (Rushdi, 1983;1985;1986;1987;1997;2001a;2004;Rushdi and Amashah, 2011;Rushdi and Al-Yahya, 2000a;2000b;2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reconstructed function f (X) in every case is set in a canonical form, such as the complete-sum form (the Blake Canonical from) (Brown, 2003;Rudeanu, 1974;2001;Blake, 1938;Tison, 1967;Reusch, 1975;Cutler et al, 1979;Muroga, 1979;Gregg, 1998;Rushdi and Al-Yahya, 2001;Rushdi, 2001b), to facilitate proving its equivalence to the original function. The methods presented herein are a mixture of purely-algebraic methods and map methods that utilize the variableentered Karnaugh map (Rushdi, 1983;1985;1986;1987;1997;2001a;2004;Rushdi and Amashah, 2011;Rushdi and Al-Yahya, 2000a;2000b;2001). These methods are demonstrated with carefullychosen illustrative examples over big Boolean algebras of various sizes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations