2011
DOI: 10.1109/msp.2010.938758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lattice Reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
136
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
136
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Block-Toeplitz matrices have been considered to evaluate the performance of the different implementations. These type of matrices are usually used in wireless communications [17]. Figure 3 shows the computational times of the MB-LLL algorithm based on the architectures discussed in Section 3. l denotes the size of the processed blocks.…”
Section: Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Block-Toeplitz matrices have been considered to evaluate the performance of the different implementations. These type of matrices are usually used in wireless communications [17]. Figure 3 shows the computational times of the MB-LLL algorithm based on the architectures discussed in Section 3. l denotes the size of the processed blocks.…”
Section: Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Minkowski or Hermite-Korkine-Zolotareff reductions are the techniques that obtain the best performance in terms of reduction, but also the ones with a higher computational cost. Both techniques require the calculation of the shortest lattice vector, which has been proved to be NP-hard (see [17] and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the LLL algorithm, these include Korkine-Zolotarev (KZ) [13], and Seysen's [14] lattice reduction algorithms; see [2] and the references therein for applications to MIMO detection. In this chapter we restrict attention to the LLL algorithm, since numerous simulation studies suggest that lattice-reduction-aided detection is well suited to low-complexity MIMO receivers when large constellations are used [15,16].…”
Section: Design and Architectures For Digital Signal Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transformation is performed on the H channel matrix finding another base with better orthogonality. Different reduction techniques have been proposed [69], however the algorithm proposed by Lenstra, Lenstra and Lovász known as LLL [70] is the most commonly used because although it is a suboptimal method, it offers a good tradeoff between performance and complexity. However, the total number of arithmetic operations required by the LLL algorithm is difficult to predict due to the lack of a bounded worst case complexity.…”
Section: : End Formentioning
confidence: 99%