2020
DOI: 10.1360/tb-2019-0864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Layout optimization of oil-gas gathering and transportation system in constrained three-dimensional space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hiroshi [19] further improved the quality of the model by weighting the user ratings with the product theme information contained in the condensed reviews. Liu et al [20] proposed a hybrid recommendation algorithm that integrates user ratings, sentiment, and product content and then recommended products by filling in the space "user-rating" matrix.…”
Section: Research On Review-based Recommendation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hiroshi [19] further improved the quality of the model by weighting the user ratings with the product theme information contained in the condensed reviews. Liu et al [20] proposed a hybrid recommendation algorithm that integrates user ratings, sentiment, and product content and then recommended products by filling in the space "user-rating" matrix.…”
Section: Research On Review-based Recommendation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e M value is used to adjust the respective weight and weighted areas of neighboring frames in the fusion process, and the higher the M value, the wider the transition range between neighboring frames and the smoother the transition, and vice versa. is nonlinear fusion process can adjust the transition rate and range at the boundary of the blending range in real time to solve the ghosting problem and enhance the fusion effect of the image [30][31][32]. e experiment is divided into two parts: the simulation part compares the size of the shadow area visually through data software, and the actual test part compares the fusion effect to judge the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods.…”
Section: Nonlinear Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e top-down approach refers to extracting the relevant ontology and pattern information directly from the highquality dataset, while the bottom-up approach refers to extracting the resource patterns from the collected large amount of data and then selecting the ones with high confidence as the basis for the subsequent knowledge map construction [13]. For some more mature domains with complete knowledge systems, the top-down approach is usually adopted; that is, the schema ontology is defined first, and then knowledge is extracted using supervised, semisupervised, and unsupervised methods, and finally the domain knowledge map is improved by combining knowledge fusion and knowledge inference mechanisms.…”
Section: Related Knowledge and Research Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%