“…It should be made clear, though, that as much as these social problems are not 3 "This new sexual order [based on the value of sexual democracy] also produced their own waste: their responsible, who do not take due care (of oneself and others) and, in the most extreme and monstrous limit, pedophiles or abusers of children, who flout the main criteria -responsibility, consent and equalitythat define the free, secure, worthy and legitimate sex, according to the doctrine of human rights" (Lowenkron, 2015:62-63). 4 Several authors have drawn attention to the centrality of consent in the regulation of sexuality both on contemporary political and legal arena (Vigarello, 1998;Lowenkron, 2007Lowenkron, , 2015Borrillo, 2009;Carrara, 2012) and in the micropolitical negotiations of boundaries between the legitimate and the spurious in the field of eroticism and sexual practices (Gregori, 2004;Zilli, 2009;Dìaz-Benítez, 2012;Facchini and Axe, 2013). so, or equally, recent 5 ; their forms of understanding and moral questioning have been considerably reworded in recent decades. That is, they have both come to be defined and regulated in national and international legal instruments no longer as an immorality or an offense against family values, but as violence against the offended person and a serious violation of human rights.…”