2002
DOI: 10.1515/ling.2002.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Le: from pronoun to verbal intensifier

Abstract: This paper shows a synchronic use of le in Mexican Spanish that is different from its object pronoun function. Intensifier le is a verbal affix that emphasizes the ''doing'' of the action indicated by the verbal base, where an erstwhile participant has become a locus for the realization of the action. Diachronically, this use results from two bleaching processes: weakening of argument status, through the decline of direct object uses ( leísmo), and weakening of pronominal status, through the rise of dative dup… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible development that can be established along these lines is the use of the dative clitic as an intensifier or verb modifier in Mexican Spanish. This is a relatively well-known and highly productive phenomenon in this variety where the dative clitic appears with either a transitive or intransitive verb to express an intensive meaning as in (5) ( Torres Cacoullos, 2002 ; Navarro-Ibarra, 2007 ; Navarro and Espinal, 2012 ). Crucially, in this innovative use, the dative clitic can alternate with the accusative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible development that can be established along these lines is the use of the dative clitic as an intensifier or verb modifier in Mexican Spanish. This is a relatively well-known and highly productive phenomenon in this variety where the dative clitic appears with either a transitive or intransitive verb to express an intensive meaning as in (5) ( Torres Cacoullos, 2002 ; Navarro-Ibarra, 2007 ; Navarro and Espinal, 2012 ). Crucially, in this innovative use, the dative clitic can alternate with the accusative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Con respecto al oi, en el corpus se constató la coocurrencia del pronombre dativo con un oi léxico o un oi en forma de sintagma oblicuo (a + pronombre oblicuo) en la casi totalidad de las cláusulas, independientemente de la posición del oi en relación con el verbo finito; es decir, tanto en doblados de clítico en sentido estricto como en dislocaciones. Esto corrobora la misma tendencia registrada para todas las variedades del español estudiadas (véase, entre muchos otros, Rini, 1991;Bogard, 1992;Fernández Soriano, 1999;Company, 2002;Torres Cacoullos, 2002;Flores y Melis, 2004), aunque esta tendencia se presente "en diferentes estados de evolución y ofrezca grados de gramaticalización muy diversos" (Flores y Melis, 2004, p. 353). La cuantificación de los datos encontrados en nuestro corpus muestra que el grado de gramaticalización de la realización del clítico de oi es casi absoluto (de un 99%), comparable a la proporción entre 90% y 96%, "cercana a un uso absoluto" (Company, 2002, p. 52), que se documentó en la variedad mexicana.…”
Section: Conclusionesunclassified
“…Torres Cacoullos (2002) proposes that le is a sort of verb intensifier that denotes "the doing of the action", however, formally le is nothing more than an expletive. Prima facie le causes intensification, but we think that this "intensification" is only a pragmatic consequence of something else.…”
Section: Some Previous Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%