Le Regole Della Navigazione. La Responsabilità Dell’armatore Nell’età Dei Severi

Abstract

In the famous passage of D. 4.9.3.1, Ulpiano reported and commented on the headingpraetorium of the Edict that regulated the failure to return things entrusted to nautae, cauponesand stabularii. He highlighted the issue of the scope of the action honorary ex recepto respect tocivil actions (locati-conducti), to assure the integrity of the thing received in the case of maritimetransport. The same Ulpiano, continuing, recalled an innovation proposal and obtained in theAugustan age by Labeo, which consists of a exceptio in factum, such as to relieve the shipownerfrom the risk of deterioration of the thing in case of naufragium and vis piratarum.The ‘readings’ of the passage have been numerous and often divergent. This seems to justifya review, which, based on abundant and perspicuous readings that interpreters of the text haveprovided, intended to further deepen the fragment D. 4.9.3.1, both in its content (initial andsuccessive, until Justinian) as the inside thoughts and work of Ulpiano.

La aequitas contributionis como fundamento de la prohibición de enriquecerse con detrimento ajeno en la lex Rhodia de iactu

“…: de Robertis, 1952de Robertis, 1983, pp. 462 s.;Casola, 2014, p. 61. 23 Señala Ortega González, 2015 nada impide que se reúna en una misma persona la figura de dominus navis y la de exercitor navis».…”