1954
DOI: 10.3109/17453675408988556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Le Spondylolisthesis Chez L'enfant et L'adolescent1(Etude de 50 cas)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
1
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
43
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the superior surface of the lower vertebral body is divided into quarters and a grade of I-IV is assigned to slips of one, two, three or four quarters of the superior vertebra, respectively. The second method, first described by Taillard [57], expresses the degree of slip as a percentage of the AP diameter of the top of the lower vertebra (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Grading Of Spondylolisthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the superior surface of the lower vertebral body is divided into quarters and a grade of I-IV is assigned to slips of one, two, three or four quarters of the superior vertebra, respectively. The second method, first described by Taillard [57], expresses the degree of slip as a percentage of the AP diameter of the top of the lower vertebra (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Grading Of Spondylolisthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 In this 26-year-old patient with spondyloptosis, SI is normal in L4; for this reason, the instrumented and fusion area includes only L5. Reduction technique allows a minimal distraction of the L5-S1 segment Deformity measures Spondylolisthesis was measured according to the Taillard technique [34] and Meyerding Grade [23]. In addition, all patients had a SI [20% and were categorized as highdysplastic with an increased risk of progression of slip and deformity and offered surgical stabilization.…”
Section: Surgical Indicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percent of slip was measured following Taillard W (1954) (Fig.7). Bone union was evaluated based on criteria by Yamamoto et al (1990).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%