Diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy or trauma and cervical corpectomy procedures increase the risk for having major intraoperative alerts. In case of persistent tceMEP/SSEP amplitude loss, consider delaying potentially harmful interventions, such as premature termination of the procedure or methylprednisolone infusion, until a new neurologic deficit is verified with an awake-clinical examination.

No abstract

The classification system of spondylolisthesis proposed by Marchetti and Bartolozzi is the most practical regarding prognosis and treatment and includes the description of both low-and high-dysplastic developmental spondylolisthesis (HDDS). Unfortunately, it does not provide strict criteria on how to differentiate between these two subtypes. The accepted treatment for HDDS is surgical. However, there is no consensus on how to surgically stabilize this subtype of spondylolisthesis, and although the concept of reducing spinal deformity before fusion is attractive, the issue of surgical reduction versus in situ fusion remains controversial, especially for HDDS (Meyerding Grades III and IV). The purpose of this study was (1) to describe the severity index (SI) as a simple method that can be used in the identification of low-dysplastic developmental spondylolisthesis from HDDS allowing earlier surgical stabilization to prevent slip progression, (2) to provide guidelines for using the unstable zone for the inclusion of L4 in stabilization, and (3) to describe a surgical technique in the reduction and stabilization of this challenging surgical entity in an attempt to decrease the risk of iatrogenic L5 neurologic injury. The concepts of SI and unstable zone in the evaluation and treatment of HDDS are relatively new. In our study, patients with an SI value [20% were classified as having HDDS and surgical stabilization was offered. In addition, all vertebrae that were contained in the defined unstable zone were surgically instrumented and fused with attempts at anatomic reduction. This case series involved the retrospective radiological review of 25 consecutive patients surgically treated for HDDS between April 2000 and September 2004 by two senior surgeons. All 25 patients had a minimum 3-year follow-up. Reduction of slip, lumbosacral kyphosis, sacral inclination, fusion rate, maintenance of reduction, and iatrogenic L5 neurologic injury were evaluated. Twentytwo patients underwent a single-level L5-S1 fusion. Three patients had extension of the L5-S1 fusion to include L4 because it fell into the unstable zone. Slip improved from 67.2 to 13.6%, focal L5-S1 kyphosis improved from ?17.5°to -6.4°. There were no pseudoarthroses and all patients had radiographic evidence of solid bony fusion at latest follow-up. To date, there have been no re-operations secondary to progression of deformity or loss of fixation. Two re-operations were performed, one for a superficial wound infection, the other for further laparoscopic decompression for continued L5 nerve root symptoms after the index surgery. One patient developed an iatrogenic L5 radiculopathy with dysaesthesiae 3 days postoperatively which completely resolved over 6 weeks. HDDS is best treated surgically. Early identification and stabilization of this challenging surgical entity could prevent the progression of slip and deformity making the index surgery less technically demanding. Vertebrae that are contained in the unstable zone can be instrumented and stabilized ...

No abstract

Study Design. A retrospective study.Objective. To determine the efficacy of using intraoperative cell saver in decreasing the need for blood transfusion.Summary of Background Data. Lumbar spine surgery is associated with potential large intraoperative blood loss, which may put patients at risk for blood transfusions. Preoperative autologous blood donation mitigates the need for allogenic blood transfusion, but does not eliminate it. Cell-saver use has been advocated to further reduce the need for transfusion, but recent reports have called its efficacy into question.Methods. Data were collected from 188 patients undergoing consecutive instrumented lumbar laminectomy and fusion. One hundred and forty-one of these patients had cell saver used during their procedures, whereas 47 did not. In addition, previously published data from similarly treated patients were used for analysis. Operative blood loss, autologous and allogenic blood transfusions, discharge hematocrit, and patient factors were analyzed.Results. A significant increase in the number of blood transfusions was found in the cell-saver group. The cellsaver group also had a significantly increased blood loss compared with the non-cell-saver group. Using analysis of covariance, we determined the effect of blood loss on the need for transfusion. The results showed that correcting for blood loss eliminated the significance in the transfusion difference, but cell saver still was not able to decrease the transfusion need. Comparing our current results with our previously published results also demonstrated no benefit of cell saver use.Conclusion. Use of cell saver in instrumented lumbar fusion cases was not able to decrease the need for blood transfusion. Cell-saver use was associated with a significantly higher blood loss.