2001
DOI: 10.2143/bsl.96.1.503748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Le statut syntaxique des objets «nus» en persan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to the structure of the Persian VP, some authors (e.g., Ghomeshi and Massam 1994, Vahedi-Langrudi 1996, Samvelian 2001) have assumed that bare nouns in a light-verb construction are not syntactically different from bare direct objects of transitive verbs; that is, the two sentences in (38) below would have the same underlying structure. The predicative root and the bare object would occupy the same position in the syntactic configuration and should therefore receive identical treatment.…”
Section: The L-syntax Of Ideophonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the structure of the Persian VP, some authors (e.g., Ghomeshi and Massam 1994, Vahedi-Langrudi 1996, Samvelian 2001) have assumed that bare nouns in a light-verb construction are not syntactically different from bare direct objects of transitive verbs; that is, the two sentences in (38) below would have the same underlying structure. The predicative root and the bare object would occupy the same position in the syntactic configuration and should therefore receive identical treatment.…”
Section: The L-syntax Of Ideophonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, Persian complex predicates are multiword expressions and thus display some lexical properties such as lexicalization, they display all properties of syntactic combinations, including some degree of semantic compositionality. Hence, as Samvelian (2001Samvelian ( , 2012 extensively argues, it is impossible to establish a clearcut distinction between (prep-)noun-verb complex predicates and "ordinary" objectverb combinations. In other words, the differentiation is better reflected by a continuum from highly lexicalized complex predicates to ordinary complement-verb combinations rather than a categorical distinction.…”
Section: Complex Predicatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A convincing example comes from Samvelian (2001) (the sentences are slightly modified from the original). In (13a), we have a "bare" preverb mesvak 'brush' and the light verb zaedaen 'hit.'…”
Section: The Dual Nature Of Noun Preverbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This question has triggered much debate in the literature concerning the relation of the nominal element in CPrs and the light verb. The result is a two-way split: according to some researchers, noun preverbs are just like (bare) direct objects (Samvelian 2001;2004). According to others, most notably Megerdoomian (2006), noun preverbs differ from objects and occupy a different position in the syntactic structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation