2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leader-employee congruence of expected contributions in the employee-organization relationship

Abstract: Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author's name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pagination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the individual social exchange relationship, civil servants may not use the structurally available offered inducements in their job as a coping mechanism. The interpretation that the individual employee–organization relationship functions as an interpretation framework for the high‐level structural employee–organization relationship is also in accordance with the finding in recent research that social exchange resources from the leader compensate for an employment relationship with lower offered inducements (Audenaert et al ), and with the finding that the congruency of the demands from employees and leaders affects how employees react on the demands of their own employee–organization relationship (Audenaert et al ). Further research could address why people in the same structural situation perceive different social exchanges.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Depending on the individual social exchange relationship, civil servants may not use the structurally available offered inducements in their job as a coping mechanism. The interpretation that the individual employee–organization relationship functions as an interpretation framework for the high‐level structural employee–organization relationship is also in accordance with the finding in recent research that social exchange resources from the leader compensate for an employment relationship with lower offered inducements (Audenaert et al ), and with the finding that the congruency of the demands from employees and leaders affects how employees react on the demands of their own employee–organization relationship (Audenaert et al ). Further research could address why people in the same structural situation perceive different social exchanges.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In addition, the employer requests broad contributions from employees beyond what is necessary for their individual position, such as loyalty to the organization, assisting junior colleagues, and learning organization‐specific skills (Tsui et al ). The employer offers informal or formal developmental inducements such as career management and mentoring that are beneficial to employees' well‐being (Audenaert et al ).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implies that relation between certain job demands might be nonlinear, following an inverted U shape (i.e., dome shape) (Sawang, 2012). Nonetheless, such nonlinear effects seldom feature in contemporary empirical public administration (Audenaert et al, 2018;Noblet & Rodwell, 2009). This study focuses on typical job demands, expected contributions, which are defined as the intensity to which individual employees are confronted with personal goals, targets, and expectations in the workplace.…”
Section: The Contemporary Job Demands-resources Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important to keep in mind that the positive influences of job demands on employee outcomes could be affected by the "too-much-of-a-goodthing-effect." In other words, such positive influences could be limited to a certain threshold (Audenaert et al, 2018;Pierce & Aguinis, 2013). Therefore, we also take into account the potential nonlinearity of these relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%