2016 American Control Conference (ACC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2016.7525346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leader-follower consensus with unknown control direction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark Different from the hyper sliding surface method, which well solves the problem of unknown control directions for two‐order systems in finite time, the proposed method solves the problem of unknown control directions for high‐order multiagent systems, and consensus is guaranteed to be achieved with a fixed‐time convergence rate.…”
Section: Distributed Consensus Control Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark Different from the hyper sliding surface method, which well solves the problem of unknown control directions for two‐order systems in finite time, the proposed method solves the problem of unknown control directions for high‐order multiagent systems, and consensus is guaranteed to be achieved with a fixed‐time convergence rate.…”
Section: Distributed Consensus Control Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, position of each robot influences its own controlling effect in the robot formation tracking problem. To handle this issue, there are mainly three systematic approaches: the switching detection method [17], the nonlinear proportionalintegral (PI) scheme [18], [19], and the Nussbaum gain technique [20]- [24]. In particular, the switching mechanism is proposed in [17] to deal with the unknown control sign, where the nonsmooth design may bring undesired chattering behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To handle this issue, there are mainly three systematic approaches: the switching detection method [17], the nonlinear proportionalintegral (PI) scheme [18], [19], and the Nussbaum gain technique [20]- [24]. In particular, the switching mechanism is proposed in [17] to deal with the unknown control sign, where the nonsmooth design may bring undesired chattering behaviors. The authors in [18], [19] develops nonlinear PI schemes to solve this problem for a networked of single-and double-integrator agents over strongly connected graphs, where the design relies on the assumption that the control coefficients have to be constant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%