2022
DOI: 10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaders or Followers? A Temporal Analysis of Tweets from IRA Trolls

Abstract: The Internet Research Agency (IRA) influences online political conversations in the United States, exacerbating existing partisan divides and sowing discord. In this paper we investigate the IRA's communication strategies by analyzing trending terms on Twitter to identify cases in which the IRA leads or follows other users. Our analysis focuses on over 38M tweets posted between 2016 and 2017 from IRA users (n=3,613), journalists (n=976), members of Congress (n=526), and politically engaged users from the gener… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pseudo-Preference Generation Given the success paradigms of leveraging LLMs in natural language applications (Wu, Zhang, and Huang 2023), we incorporate the powerful knowledge of LLMs to retrieve user preferences from posts. Specifically, we opt for the preferred topic and emotion to represent the preference of each user from the corresponding posts since anomalous users may exploit them to achieve malicious intentions (Ghanem, Buscaldi, and Rosso 2019;Balasubramanian et al 2022). The 10 recent posts of user i are used as the prompt for LLM to generate the topic t and the emotion e used in each tweet j:…”
Section: Pre-training Stage: Learning User Preferences Via Postsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pseudo-Preference Generation Given the success paradigms of leveraging LLMs in natural language applications (Wu, Zhang, and Huang 2023), we incorporate the powerful knowledge of LLMs to retrieve user preferences from posts. Specifically, we opt for the preferred topic and emotion to represent the preference of each user from the corresponding posts since anomalous users may exploit them to achieve malicious intentions (Ghanem, Buscaldi, and Rosso 2019;Balasubramanian et al 2022). The 10 recent posts of user i are used as the prompt for LLM to generate the topic t and the emotion e used in each tweet j:…”
Section: Pre-training Stage: Learning User Preferences Via Postsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is extensive research on manipulation strategies and the actors involved. For instance, adversaries including government entities employ political troll accounts to influence public opinion and sway elections (Zannettou et al 2019;Balasubramanian et al 2022). Automated accounts, and bots, amplify social media posts by reposting them (Chavoshi, Hamooni, and Mueen 2016;Elmas, Overdorf, and Aberer 2022).…”
Section: Related Work Social Media Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…spammers (Herzallah, Faris, and Adwan 2018;Danilchenko, Segal, and Vilenchik 2022), fake followers (Cresci et al 2015), impersonating bots (Goga, Venkatadri, and Gummadi 2015), retweet bots (Elmas, Overdorf, and Aberer 2022), and astroturfing bots (Elmas et al 2021). Most of the research on non-automated sock puppets relies on datasets published by Twitter, such as IRA trolls (Balasubramanian et al 2022). Our work tries to break out of this pattern.…”
Section: Background Survey Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%