2012
DOI: 10.1071/ah11022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leadership collaboration during health reform: an action learning approach with an interagency group of executives in Tasmania

Abstract: Getting the participants together was challenging, which may reflect the reality of time-poor executives, or a low commitment to giving time to structured and deliberative informal dialogue. Further work is required to test this thesis and the action learning approach with other parts of healthcare workforce.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing costs, maintenance of service provision and changing societal needs all contribute to the need for change. Although reform of health care to improve efficiency and equity is a praiseworthy undertaking by government bodies, caution is required to ensure that true reform agendas are delivered in areas where adversarial organisational contexts are likely to resist change (Harpur, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increasing costs, maintenance of service provision and changing societal needs all contribute to the need for change. Although reform of health care to improve efficiency and equity is a praiseworthy undertaking by government bodies, caution is required to ensure that true reform agendas are delivered in areas where adversarial organisational contexts are likely to resist change (Harpur, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenges facing policy makers include engagement of all stakeholders to effectively build the structural frameworks necessary for reform. Knowledge of the barriers responsible for constraint of prior reforms, understanding of stakeholder priorities and awareness of conflicts of interest must be identified early (Harpur, ). The political decision‐making process as described by Jansen, van Oers, Kok, and de Vries () is an attempt to accommodate various stakeholder groups through bargaining, lobbying and negotiating, with the final decisions a result of compromise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observation notes were captured during this component, and key These concepts, assessed using an evaluation tool adapted from a co-production self-assessment framework by Public Health Services Tasmania, 39 are detailed in previous frameworks and research. 40 Participants were asked to provide a rating level on a three-point scale for each of the four co-development principles (definitions were provided; see Supplementary) based on how well they perceived the workshop addressed each principle, and given the option…”
Section: Implementation Support Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%