1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1057-5219(99)00007-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leadership structure and firm performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear from the above discussion that the role of institutional investment is different in China from in other developed countries, as they allow firms to list with dual-class structures, whereas insiders of Chinese dual-class firms may use it to satisfy concerns and to increase investor confidence. We do not witness any significant relationship between CEO-Chairman Duality and market performance variables, whereas other researchers find that CEO-Chairman Duality affects performance negatively (Yermack 1996;Fosberg and Nelson 1999;Kajola 2008;Tian 2013).…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultscontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is clear from the above discussion that the role of institutional investment is different in China from in other developed countries, as they allow firms to list with dual-class structures, whereas insiders of Chinese dual-class firms may use it to satisfy concerns and to increase investor confidence. We do not witness any significant relationship between CEO-Chairman Duality and market performance variables, whereas other researchers find that CEO-Chairman Duality affects performance negatively (Yermack 1996;Fosberg and Nelson 1999;Kajola 2008;Tian 2013).…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultscontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…This finding is quite interesting, as it is evident from the literature that institutions push firms to adapt adequate governance practices, which affects performance positively (Yermack 1996;Fosberg and Nelson 1999;Kajola 2008). Our findings are contrary to the literature, and may be because of the role of institutions in China.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We use a CEO/chair duality dummy as a proxy for CEO power and leadership structure. Fosberg and Nelson (1999) find a positive relationship between the change in leadership style from the unitary leadership structure to a dual leadership structure (CEO/chair duality) and financial performance.…”
Section: Data and Variables Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Annual Reports Coombes and Wong, 2004;Donaldson and Davis, 1991;Fosberg and Nelson, 1999;Hashim and Devi, 2009;Ritchie, 2007 Board committees Total number of board committees in the company Annual Reports Adams, Hermalin and Weisbach, 2010;McColgan, 2001;Puni, 2015 Ownership concentration Total per cent of equity shares held by the first 5 largest shareholders Annual Reports Desender, 2009;Fama and Jensen, 1983;La Porta et al, 2000;Shleifer and Vishny, 1986;Wahla, Shah and Hussain, 2012 Age Number of years firm is listed on stock exchange KSE website Fama and French, 2004;Shumway, 2000 Size Measured in total sales of the firm (natural logarithm)…”
Section: Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%