1996
DOI: 10.2514/3.13392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leading-edge bluntness effects in high enthalpy, hypersonic compression corner flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3][4][5] In order to reduce aerodynamic resistance, an extremely sharp wing leading edge is required and a radius with a magnitude of millimeters is commonly employed. [6][7][8] In contrast to traditional subsonic and supersonic conditions, since the speed of hypersonic aircraft has been raised significantly, high temperature becomes one of the vital features, as most of the kinetic energy of the high speed airflow, just outside the sharp local structure, transforms into internal energy. 9 This is the result of a strong action of compression, friction and viscous dissipation, and it makes heat flux transmitted into the leading edge becomes intense.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[3][4][5] In order to reduce aerodynamic resistance, an extremely sharp wing leading edge is required and a radius with a magnitude of millimeters is commonly employed. [6][7][8] In contrast to traditional subsonic and supersonic conditions, since the speed of hypersonic aircraft has been raised significantly, high temperature becomes one of the vital features, as most of the kinetic energy of the high speed airflow, just outside the sharp local structure, transforms into internal energy. 9 This is the result of a strong action of compression, friction and viscous dissipation, and it makes heat flux transmitted into the leading edge becomes intense.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Studies related to bluntness effects on pressure, skin-friction and heat transfer in both attached and separated flows have also been conducted, for example, Bertram (1954), Bertram & Henderson (1958), Cheng et al. (1961), Holden (1971), Stollery (1972), and in recent years, Mason & Lee (1994), Smith & Khorrami (1994), Mallinson, Gai & Mudford (1996), Marini (1998), Borovoy, Skuratov & Struminskaya (2008), Borovoy et al. (2014), John & Kulkarni (2014), Khraibut, Gai & Neely (2019) and Mallinson, Mudford & Gai (2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Mallinson et al. (1996) and Khraibut et al. (2019) analysed bluntness effects using this same parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of βb is above 0.1 indicating a viscous-dominated regime, while the other cases with βb below 0.1 showing a blunt-dominated regime. [25][26] The separation point xs and reattachment point xr vary with the impingement point xi, as shown in Fig. 17.…”
Section: Swbli Near a Convex Corner Downstream Of A Flat Plate Witmentioning
confidence: 98%