2015
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1511.04473
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leading-order hadronic contribution to the electron and muon g-2

Fred Jegerlehner

Abstract: I present a new data driven update of the hadronic vacuum polarization effects for the muon and the electron g − 2. For the leading order contributions I find a had(1) µ = (686.99 ± 4.21)[687.19 ± 3.48] × 10 −10 based on e + e − data [incl. τ data], a had(2) µ * Invited talk FCCP2015 -Workshop on "Flavour changing and conserving processes," 10-

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Below, we include the additional contributions that needs to be incorporated on top of the pseudoscalar one. In our opinion, this requires the π, K loops, 14 the axial resonances 64 and the quark-loop, 14 necessary to provide the appropriate high-energy behavior -the scalar and tensor resonances are partially included in π, K loops. We obtain 33…”
Section: Pseudoscalar Pole Contributions To Hlblmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Below, we include the additional contributions that needs to be incorporated on top of the pseudoscalar one. In our opinion, this requires the π, K loops, 14 the axial resonances 64 and the quark-loop, 14 necessary to provide the appropriate high-energy behavior -the scalar and tensor resonances are partially included in π, K loops. We obtain 33…”
Section: Pseudoscalar Pole Contributions To Hlblmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5), but there is some hint that the discrepancy is getting better at higher mass, which kind-of supports the use of pQCD for the calculation of the dispersion integral above E cut . Note that given the improvement in precision of the hadronic cross sections, the most recent prediction [15] restricts the s range over which pQCD is used to [4.5 -9.3] GeV and [13 GeV -∞[.…”
Section: Recent Babar Lo (E + E − → F γ) Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4), but there is some hint that the discrepancy is getting better at higher mass, which kind-of supports the use of pQCD for the calculation of the dispersion integral above E cut . Note that given the improvement in precision of the hadronic cross sections, the most recent prediction [16] restricts the s range over which pQCD is used to [4.5 -9.3] GeV and [13 GeV -∞[. ).…”
Section: Top)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Thanks to the high-precision results obtained up to the end of 2014, the uncertainty on a VP µ is now smaller than 4 × 10 −10 [16]. That work includes a NNLO correction for a VP µ [17] and a NLO contribution to a LbL µ [18].…”
Section: Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation