“…This literature has extensively inquired into the history, developments and deployments of many martial arts (e.g., Green and Svinth, 2003 ) and their deconstruction (e.g., Bowman, 2019a ), focusing especially on their “culture of combats” (e.g., Sánchez-García and Spencer, 2013 ; Brown et al, 2019 ), pedagogical environments, processes of apprenticeship, and knowledge transmission (e.g., Wacquant, 2004 ; Brown, 2005 , 2011 ; Downey, 2005 , 2008 ; Spencer, 2009 , 2014 ; Brown and Jennings, 2011 ; Downey et al, 2015 ; Jennings et al, 2020 ), embodiment and sensuous involvement (e.g., Stephens and Delamont, 2006 ; Samudra, 2008 ; Farrer and Whalen-Bridge, 2011 ; Spencer, 2011 , 2012 ; Jennings, 2013 ; Channon and Jennings, 2014 ; Southwood and Delamont, 2018 ; Telles et al, 2018 ), religious and spiritual bearings (e.g., Maliszewski, 1996 ; Brown et al, 2009 , 2014 ; Jennings et al, 2010 ; Brown, 2013 ; Tuckett, 2016 ; Pedrini, 2020 ), and media representations (e.g., Brown et al, 2008 ; Jakubowska et al, 2016 ; Yip, 2017 ; Bowman, 2019b , c , d , 2020a , b ; Trausch, 2019 ). Moreover, as this body of work increases, specializes and further develops, also its attention to conceptual clarity and theoretical developments intensifies, with the consequent introduction of a host of new concepts and theoretical perspectives (e.g., Brown and Jennings, 2013 ; Sánchez-García and Spencer, 2013 ; Cynarski and Skowron, 2014 ; Martínková and Parry, 2016 ; Bowman, 2017 ; Cynarski, 2017 , 2019a ; Jenninings, 2019; Pedrini et al, 2019 ) oriented to the creation, maintenance, and re-invention of the disciplinary boundaries of martial arts and combat sports and martial arts studies and to their legitimacy as autonomous fields of study. However, as rightly underlined in the journal's description of this special ...…”