2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2019.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leading through discontinuous change: A typology of problems and leadership approaches in UK boards

Abstract: relational or external-hostile), the chair of the board either takes the leadership role or a collaborative, joint leadership role with the CEO. When facing "tame" problems (transformational-internal or industry-external), a new CEO is often appointed to undertake an extensive diagnosis of the problem and take the lead, with the chair acting as a vigilant monitor. These findings are integrated into a typology of problems and board leadership approaches, augmenting the literature on complex problems. The study … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(105 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…How does a board chair effectively handle communication with different stakeholders in a crisis? Here, future research could also build on the work by Morais, Kakabadse, and Kakabadse (2018) and Morais et al (2020) who found that, in companies facing tensions in their strategic choices, such as balancing between exploration and exploitation, board chairs and CEOs develop a working relationship that is more interdependent and collaborative than what is typically depicted in the literature on the board chair. Examining such issues from a longitudinal perspective and in difficult times could add new knowledge on how the role of the board chair changes over time depending on external contextual factors.…”
Section: The Context Of Timementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…How does a board chair effectively handle communication with different stakeholders in a crisis? Here, future research could also build on the work by Morais, Kakabadse, and Kakabadse (2018) and Morais et al (2020) who found that, in companies facing tensions in their strategic choices, such as balancing between exploration and exploitation, board chairs and CEOs develop a working relationship that is more interdependent and collaborative than what is typically depicted in the literature on the board chair. Examining such issues from a longitudinal perspective and in difficult times could add new knowledge on how the role of the board chair changes over time depending on external contextual factors.…”
Section: The Context Of Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, it has been argued that an independent board chair ensures better checks and balances and, in particular, controls the CEO's opportunistic behavior (Krause et al, 2014; Rechner & Dalton, 1991). However, this argument is contested in recent studies, in which scholars suggested that a separate board chair can facilitate greater collaboration with the CEO and other board members, resulting in a better firm performance (Bezemer et al, 2018; Krause, 2017; Morais, Kakabadse, & Kakabadse, 2020). In fact, the authors found that effective board chairs help alleviate board–CEO conflicts, orient board members to more strongly emphasize shareholders' interests, and engage in productive discussions by facilitating a participatory environment (Bezemer et al, 2018; Guerrero, Lapalme, & Séguin, 2015; Shekshnia, 2018; Veltrop et al, 2020).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the CEO takes the responsibility of the chairperson as well as management, it reduces board effectiveness in monitoring top management while managing day to day operations (Broye et al, 2017). Two different positions for the CEO and chairperson can increase the efficiency of management accountability, better corporation performance, and minimize agency cost (Morais et al, 2020).…”
Section: Ceo Dualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, especially regarding board research, a better understanding of behavioral or collaboration‐related variables as well as board processes and dynamics is desirable. For example, future research could build on the initial qualitative research on boards in the context of innovation (Hoppmann, Naegele, & Girod, 2019; Morais, Kakabadse, & Kakabadse, 2019) to deduce potentially relevant mediating factors.…”
Section: An Agenda For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%