2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf chlorosis, epinasty, carbohydrate contents and growth of tomato show different responses to the red/blue wavelength ratio under continuous light

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same plant size, RMF was higher in RB and B compared to R ( Figures 3C,D ). Similar results were found with tomato seedlings where the blue light increased the RMF, although the root-to-shoot ratio was 0.14 in red light and 0.31 under blue light in the experiment by Izzo et al ( 2020 ), and 0.10 and 0.08 in the study of Pham et al ( 2019 ). The slope of RMF vs. log-total DW was higher in RB and B treatments under low nitrogen ( Figure 4C ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same plant size, RMF was higher in RB and B compared to R ( Figures 3C,D ). Similar results were found with tomato seedlings where the blue light increased the RMF, although the root-to-shoot ratio was 0.14 in red light and 0.31 under blue light in the experiment by Izzo et al ( 2020 ), and 0.10 and 0.08 in the study of Pham et al ( 2019 ). The slope of RMF vs. log-total DW was higher in RB and B treatments under low nitrogen ( Figure 4C ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Izzo et al ( 2020 ) reported that red light reduced tomato root growth and root-to-shoot ratio compared to the mixture of red light with blue light. Pham et al ( 2019 ) found blue light reduced root weight compared to red light and mixed red and blue light in tomato seedlings. Sakuraba and Yanagisawa ( 2018 ) reviewed the effects of light signaling on sucrose transportation via expression of sugar transporter by HY5, which could induce phloem-mobile sucrose in leaf to promote root development and nitrate uptake (Lejay et al, 2003 ; Chen et al, 2012 ; Kircher and Schopfer, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soluble sugar accumulation under blue light might be due to photosynthetic carbon partitioning as well as related to stomatal aperture and amount of stomata, which displayed a high sensitivity to blue light ( Fantini et al, 2019 ). A previous study showed that tomato seedlings under continuous monochromatic blue light displayed the lowest contents of starch and soluble sugars, compared to the other treatments due to leaf injuries caused by continuous light ( Pham et al, 2019 ). Intermittent illumination with 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 L/D cycles, respectively, over the period showed that higher levels of soluble sugar, especially fructose and starch, were observed in lettuce exposed to L/D (2) and L/D (3) compared with any other treatment, via increasing activities of sucrose synthase (SS), acid invertase (AI), and neutral invertase (NI) involved in sucrose metabolism ( Chen and Yang, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monochromatic R light effect on photosynthetic product accumulation has been validated in several taxa. Since both auxin biosynthesis and transport are affected by carbohydrate content, the latter may underlie the noted leaf epinasty under R light [ 60 ]. Although carbohydrate synthesis is reduced owing to disturbed photosynthetic apparatus, the increased carbohydrate content in R-exposed seedlings is possibly the result of reduced translocation out of the leaves [ 61 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%