2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-011-0657-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf litter breakdown in Mediterranean streams: effect of dissolved inorganic nutrients

Abstract: Agricultural runoff and urban activities can increase the inputs of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), into headwater streams, leading to eutrophication and thus substantially affecting the structure and functions of benthic communities. A high P concentration in water stimulates the activity of heterotrophic microorganisms associated with leaf litter and, hence, influences decomposition rates and the availability of detrital resources for macroinvertebrates. Litter breakdown of alder (Alnus glutinosa) leaves en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
10
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there was a neat negative effect of urbanisation on leaf litter decay, the decay rates in our study were related to water-nutrient content depending on the chemical identity (i.e., DIN or SRP (Englert, Zubrod, Schulz, & Bundschuh, 2013;Fleituch, 2013;Zubrod et al, 2015). However, urbanisation increased decay rates in temperate streams in Appalachian mountains (Gulis & Suberkropp, 2003b), low mountain areas (Pascoal, Cássio, Marcotegui, Sanz, & Gomes, 2005;Rossi et al, 2019), Mediterranean areas (Menéndez et al, 2011), and temperate deciduous forest (Cook & Hoellein, 2016). Even though we might speculate that enriched streams tend to reduce their decay rate, and poor nutrients streams' decay rates are enhanced by urban inputs; decay rates are also affected by previous to urbanization conditions, biome characteristics, and leaf litter species.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although there was a neat negative effect of urbanisation on leaf litter decay, the decay rates in our study were related to water-nutrient content depending on the chemical identity (i.e., DIN or SRP (Englert, Zubrod, Schulz, & Bundschuh, 2013;Fleituch, 2013;Zubrod et al, 2015). However, urbanisation increased decay rates in temperate streams in Appalachian mountains (Gulis & Suberkropp, 2003b), low mountain areas (Pascoal, Cássio, Marcotegui, Sanz, & Gomes, 2005;Rossi et al, 2019), Mediterranean areas (Menéndez et al, 2011), and temperate deciduous forest (Cook & Hoellein, 2016). Even though we might speculate that enriched streams tend to reduce their decay rate, and poor nutrients streams' decay rates are enhanced by urban inputs; decay rates are also affected by previous to urbanization conditions, biome characteristics, and leaf litter species.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Similar results were found in forested tropical urban streams (Martins, Couceiro, Melo, Moreira, & Hamada, ; Silva‐Junior, Moulton, Boëchat, & Gücker, with sites composed of urban and agricultural uses), tropical high‐altitude Andean urban streams (Iñiguez‐Armijos et al, ), and temperate hills zones after a urban wastewater plant (Englert, Zubrod, Schulz, & Bundschuh, ; Fleituch, ; Zubrod et al, ). However, urbanisation increased decay rates in temperate streams in Appalachian mountains (Gulis & Suberkropp, ), low mountain areas (Pascoal, Cássio, Marcotegui, Sanz, & Gomes, ; Rossi et al, ), Mediterranean areas (Menéndez et al, ), and temperate deciduous forest (Cook & Hoellein, ). Even though we might speculate that enriched streams tend to reduce their decay rate, and poor nutrients streams' decay rates are enhanced by urban inputs; decay rates are also affected by previous to urbanization conditions, biome characteristics, and leaf litter species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results revealed a decrease in the C: N molar ratio in leaf litter during decomposition as a result of a gradual increase in nitrogen that occurred while carbon concentration remained practically constant. Other studies have found a similar pattern (e.g., Gulis and Suberkropp, 2003;Pascoal and Cássio, 2004;Menéndez et al, 2011) and have associated it with the accumulation of microbial biomass on leaves that uptake and immobilize nitrogen from the water column as carbon is mineralized (Melillo et al, 1984;Chauvet, 1987). The mineralized litter carbon is replaced by microbial cells, which explains the small changes observed in carbon concentration (Yoshimura et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%