2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2008.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf structure and function of sweet cherry tree (Prunus avium L.) cultivars with open and dense canopies

Abstract: This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues.Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited.In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their pers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
6
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased leaf weight per unit area and an increased leaf thickness in columnar cultivars (Tables 2 and 5) might also be viewed as a response to a higher light environment in the canopy of the columnar trees, when compared to standard ones, given that apple leaves at the canopy periphery of standard trees are thicker than those more deeply sited within the canopy (Wooge and Barden, 1987). Similar associations have been made for sweet cherry (Goncalves et al, 2008). These increases might also be considered as a developmental response to water shortage (Givnish, 1988;Abrams, 1994;Jones, 1994;Larcher, 2000;Mierowski et al, 2002;Chaves et al, 2003;Feng et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Increased leaf weight per unit area and an increased leaf thickness in columnar cultivars (Tables 2 and 5) might also be viewed as a response to a higher light environment in the canopy of the columnar trees, when compared to standard ones, given that apple leaves at the canopy periphery of standard trees are thicker than those more deeply sited within the canopy (Wooge and Barden, 1987). Similar associations have been made for sweet cherry (Goncalves et al, 2008). These increases might also be considered as a developmental response to water shortage (Givnish, 1988;Abrams, 1994;Jones, 1994;Larcher, 2000;Mierowski et al, 2002;Chaves et al, 2003;Feng et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The leaf mesophyll conductance is affected by the structure and thickness of the palisade parenchyma and spongy parenchyma [4]. The palisade parenchyma affects light penetration and the spongy parenchyma alters light capture by scattering the light [32][33][34][35]. Grafting mini-watermelon onto rootstocks improved the total leaf area and the SPAD index [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several fruit tree species, the photosynthetic capacity is often related to leaf anatomical characteristics, which is influenced by ambient irradiance (Reich et al 2000;Le Roux et al 2001;Gonçalves et al 2008). Indeed, because of the lower growth irradiance conditions in the OTC, leaves developed here were more like shade-type, with slight lower leaf thickness, mainly due to significantly thinner palisade parenchyma layer, than leaves developed outside of the OTC (more sun-type leaves) (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%