2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2020.101772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leak detection systems in oil and gas fields: Present trends and future prospects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
21
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, deployment in an urban environment involves the risk of signal interference from urban activities such as traffic and damage to optical fiber for which repair or replacement can then pose a huge challenge to practitioners. However, Meribout & Khezzar (2020) review the possibility of an optical fiber system being a more robust leak detection system for oil and gas pipelines. Thus, the potential can be similarly explored through further research for the case of water pipelines as well.…”
Section: Research On Real Wdnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, deployment in an urban environment involves the risk of signal interference from urban activities such as traffic and damage to optical fiber for which repair or replacement can then pose a huge challenge to practitioners. However, Meribout & Khezzar (2020) review the possibility of an optical fiber system being a more robust leak detection system for oil and gas pipelines. Thus, the potential can be similarly explored through further research for the case of water pipelines as well.…”
Section: Research On Real Wdnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leak detection techniques based on acoustics and infrared (IR) are the most widely used techniques for the detection of liquid and gas leaks, respectively. However, these two techniques do not work sometimes [1]. For instance, IR approaches cannot accurately detect leaks in wet weather, while acoustic sensors may not accurately detect gas leaks in the target area because of noise [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these two techniques do not work sometimes [1]. For instance, IR approaches cannot accurately detect leaks in wet weather, while acoustic sensors may not accurately detect gas leaks in the target area because of noise [1]. Due to the need to purchase and install new sensors, the additional cost of buying hardware equipment may be incurred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invasive techniques include the use of tracer gases [7], ground penetrating radars [6], flow, pressure [8] and acoustics sensors [9] which include hydrophones. Examples of non-invasive techniques include the use of visual image and video sensors [10], soil humidity sensors [11], accelerometers [12] as well as acoustic sensors such as microphones [13] or geophones that are www.videleaf.com placed on the pipes' exterior. These can be further enhanced when coupled with wireless implementations using IoT solutions, thereby allowing real time continuous monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%