Over a decade ago, Barr and Tagg (Change Mag 27(6):12-25, 1995) declared that a shift had occurred in higher education from an instruction paradigm to a learning paradigm. A central element in this new paradigm is learner-centered assessment. While a growing body of literature suggests that this approach to assessment is a best practice in higher education pedagogy, it is still unclear whether faculty members have embraced it fully. Using data from the National Study of Postsecondary Faculty, this study examines the extent to which faculty members employed learner-centered assessments in postsecondary classrooms at two points in time, 1993 and 2004. Findings show similar to higher rates of use for some assessment techniques in 2004 compared to reports from 1993, as well as differences by faculty gender, age, discipline, and institution type. Implications for faculty members, student learning, and institutional policy are discussed.Keywords Learner-centered assessment Á Faculty practices in assessment Á Student learning assessmentThe assessment of student learning in postsecondary education continues to be a salient issue among educators, leaders in accrediting agencies, and elected officials (e.g., Ewell 2002; Glenn 2011; Kinzie 2010). Assessment has been a long-standing issue and an important dimension of quality instruction; however, its meaning and use have evolved significantly over the past two decades. A traditional view of assessment defines its primary role as evaluating a student's comprehension of factual knowledge. A more contemporary definition, which is growing in popularity, sees assessment as activities designed primarily to foster student learning. This more recent definition has its roots in a movement to make higher education more learner-centered, and related assessment practices are often labeled learner-centered assessment techniques.It is clear from a growing body of literature that learner-centered assessment is now considered a highly-valued practice in higher education pedagogy. Yet, it is unclear to