2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-31280-0_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning a Behavior Model of Hybrid Systems Through Combining Model-Based Testing and Machine Learning

Abstract: Models play an essential role in the design process of cyberphysical systems. They form the basis for simulation and analysis and help in identifying design problems as early as possible. However, the construction of models that comprise physical and digital behavior is challenging. Therefore, there is considerable interest in learning such hybrid behavior by means of machine learning which requires sufficient and representative training data covering the behavior of the physical system adequately. In this wor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The monitoring problem for MDPs then conservatively over-approximates the risk of a trace by assuming an adversarial scheduler, that is, by taking the supremum risk estimate over all schedulers 1 . The Monitoring Problem.…”
Section: Formal Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The monitoring problem for MDPs then conservatively over-approximates the risk of a trace by assuming an adversarial scheduler, that is, by taking the supremum risk estimate over all schedulers 1 . The Monitoring Problem.…”
Section: Formal Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predictive monitoring has been combined with deep learning [17] and Bayesian inference [22], where the key problem is that the computation of an imminent failure is too expensive to be done exactly. More generally, learning automata models has been motivated with runtime assurance [1,55]. Testing approaches statistically evaluate whether traces are likely to be produced by a given model [25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding established testing techniques, path-based testing using finite state machines (or analogous structures) as a system under test (SUT) model is discussed in five studies [55,7,5,25,20]. In addition, an SUT model based on a timed state machine has also been employed [35].…”
Section: Rq5: Used Testing Techniques and Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MBT approach, in general, is explicitly discussed in several studies [2,1,29,9,5,36,25,20], which mostly describe a general concept; particular testing technique, namely path-based testing, is discussed in the studies by Aicherning et al [5], Estivill-Castro et al [20], and Grace et al [25].…”
Section: Rq5: Used Testing Techniques and Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interpretable model generates knowledge about a system's functionality and allows the generation of complete, application-specific sets of test cases. We use the automaton model to perform an automated test case generation [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%