1996
DOI: 10.2307/2297798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning and Convergence to a Full-Information Equilibrium are not Equivalent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in Jun and Vives (1996), the analysis is based upon a simple linear model of a competitive market with a set of risk‐neutral firms I =[0,1]. In every period t =1,2,…, a firm i ∈ I must decide on its output before the realization of a stochastic demand is known, where inverse demand is given by p t = θ − φx t + u t .…”
Section: A Simple Linear Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As in Jun and Vives (1996), the analysis is based upon a simple linear model of a competitive market with a set of risk‐neutral firms I =[0,1]. In every period t =1,2,…, a firm i ∈ I must decide on its output before the realization of a stochastic demand is known, where inverse demand is given by p t = θ − φx t + u t .…”
Section: A Simple Linear Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition 1 (Jun and Vives (1996). In every period t =1,2,… there exists a unique market equilibrium, at which every firm i ∈ I chooses its supply x ( i ) t according to the linear rule that is, the price expectation of firm i is given by , where The market solution described in Proposition 1 implies that the precision τ W , t of the public statistic evolves according to For an understanding of the properties of the model and the results that will be derived below, is of central importance.…”
Section: The Market Solution and The Learning Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations