1996
DOI: 10.1353/jsh/29.4.839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning and Earning: Schooling, Juvenile Employment, and the Early Life Course in Late Nineteenth-Century New Haven

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results would be consistent with the explanation that role conflict with the employee and student role grew. In other words, parents and young people were starting to believe that childhood and adolescence were the time for education, not employment (Caldwell et al 1998; Lassonde 1996). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results would be consistent with the explanation that role conflict with the employee and student role grew. In other words, parents and young people were starting to believe that childhood and adolescence were the time for education, not employment (Caldwell et al 1998; Lassonde 1996). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus as roles become more differentiated in these societies, there is likely to be stronger role conflict between the student role and the employee role. Research suggests that in rapidly transitioning societies, an important change is that parents begin to view adolescence as a time for education and not other duties, such as employment or family formation (Caldwell et al 1998; Lassonde 1996). …”
Section: Theories and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally attendance would be measured with more detail because daily school attendance was well below the number of students enrolled or registered. For example, Lassonde (1996) notes about antebellum New Haven that only around 2/3 of those registered actually attended on a given day. However, the attendance indicator is not a bad measure explanations, I also present models that limit the sample to individuals 10 years on each side of the compulsory cutoff (ages 4 to 23 at the time of the law in most states, which required attendance until age 14) and control for age at the time of the law.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, contadini parents at the turn of the century differed little from their working-class predecessors in the United States, many of whom had resisted the introduction and enforcement of compulsory schooling from the 1870s to the end of the century (Lassonde, 1996). However, whereas compulsory school attendance and the legal apparatus that supported it were phased in gradually over the latter half of the nineteenth century in Connecticut, immigrant families arriving after 1900 encountered a highly integrated system of enforcement.…”
Section: The Contadini In New Havenmentioning
confidence: 99%