Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1718487.1718492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning concept importance using a weighted dependence model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
175
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
175
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even here there are limitations, since our lexical items are not easily aligned with those found in other collections. For this reason, we can not leverage external corpus statistics from, for example, Google or Wikipedia (Bendersky et al, 2011;Bendersky et al, 2010;Bendersky and Croft, 2008;Lease, 2009), or phrases from search logs (Svore et al, 2010).…”
Section: Motivation and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even here there are limitations, since our lexical items are not easily aligned with those found in other collections. For this reason, we can not leverage external corpus statistics from, for example, Google or Wikipedia (Bendersky et al, 2011;Bendersky et al, 2010;Bendersky and Croft, 2008;Lease, 2009), or phrases from search logs (Svore et al, 2010).…”
Section: Motivation and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent research demonstrates that more complex retrieval models that incorporate phrases, term proximities and expansion terms can significantly outperform the standard bag-of-word models, especially in the context of large-scale web collections [6] [5] [7] [8] and longer, more complex queries [9] [10].…”
Section: Ranker M * Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of these methods incorporate textual features beyond query terms and were shown to be highly effective in prior work [6] [5].…”
Section: Ranker M * Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with the last problem, Bendersky et al [1] extended recently the MRF-SD model to a weighted MRF-SD model (which we denote by WSD), in which the weight of a term and a pair of terms becomes dependent on the individual term and pair of terms. The scoring function is as follows:…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to assign variable weights to unigrams and pairs of terms. However, the relationship between non-adjacent query terms is still ignored in [1] and the ordered and un-ordered pairs of terms are treated in the same way. Our model will go a step further: we will consider dependencies between non-adjacent characters as between…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%