2017
DOI: 10.1002/asjc.1648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Control of Robot Manipulators in Task Space

Abstract: Two important properties of industrial tasks performed by robot manipulators, namely, periodicity (i.e., repetitive nature) of the task and the need for the task to be performed by the end-effector, motivated this work. Not being able to utilize the robot manipulator dynamics due to uncertainties complicated the control design. In a seemingly novel departure from the existing works in the literature, the tracking problem is formulated in the task space and the control input torque is aimed to decrease the task… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent state-ofthe-art on current and emergent control strategies for robotic manipualtors are reviewed in [40][41][42][43]. Some intelligent control schemes including artificial neural network, neuro-fuzzy control, expert system, learning control systems for robot manipulator control are also found in literature [44,45].…”
Section: Control and Dexteritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent state-ofthe-art on current and emergent control strategies for robotic manipualtors are reviewed in [40][41][42][43]. Some intelligent control schemes including artificial neural network, neuro-fuzzy control, expert system, learning control systems for robot manipulator control are also found in literature [44,45].…”
Section: Control and Dexteritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown by Example 2, the proposed model NNN-R (8) and ZNN-R model (6) work well even if the matrix to be inverted is close to rank-deficient (i.e., highly ill-conditioned). While for the GNN-R model (4), it may take a very long time to converge to the theoretical right Moore-Penrose inverse owing to the minimum eigenvalue of AA T being a very small number, and thus the convergence curve of the residual error of the GNN-R model is omitted in Figure 4.…”
Section: Example 2 Let Us Take Into Consideration the Following Hilbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous applications in mathematics and engineering fields are closely related to online solution of the Moore-Penrose inverse (also termed pseudo inverse), e.g., signal processing [1], robotics [2][3][4][5][6][7][8], and control theory [9,10]. In mathematics, given any matrix A ∈ R m × n , the Moore-Penrose inverse A + is unique, and can be derived from the following four matrix equations [11]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there are two main methods to realize the trajectory tracking control of robot manipulators in task space. One method is to use the pseudo-inverse of the Jacobian matrix [17,18,19,20,21,22]. Liu et al [17] proposed an adaptive NN controller for robot manipulators with the optimal number of hidden nodes and less computation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%