2019
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1581954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning dispatching rules using random forest in flexible job shop scheduling problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers could, for example, fit panel data regression or structural simulation models based on those input features for the sake of more transparency, or use more obscure black boxes, such as deep neural nets, while retaining the benefit of features crafted from theoretical knowledge. For instance, RF models have been shown to effectively improve the performance of job dispatching and outperform widely used dispatching rules for difficult flexible job shop scheduling problems (Jun, Lee, & Chun, 2019). Machine learning performance being a function of the input features engineered by researchers possessing theoretical knowledge of scheduling, we posit that it is contextual knowledge and theoretical understanding that gives OM researchers an edge over computer scientists and statisticians in creating input features and better applying machine learning in operational problems.…”
Section: Generalizabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers could, for example, fit panel data regression or structural simulation models based on those input features for the sake of more transparency, or use more obscure black boxes, such as deep neural nets, while retaining the benefit of features crafted from theoretical knowledge. For instance, RF models have been shown to effectively improve the performance of job dispatching and outperform widely used dispatching rules for difficult flexible job shop scheduling problems (Jun, Lee, & Chun, 2019). Machine learning performance being a function of the input features engineered by researchers possessing theoretical knowledge of scheduling, we posit that it is contextual knowledge and theoretical understanding that gives OM researchers an edge over computer scientists and statisticians in creating input features and better applying machine learning in operational problems.…”
Section: Generalizabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Çömert et al [21] used the random forest model to predict the prediction ability of RF on large data sets. It is found that the prediction ability of the random forest model based on bagging algorithm is better; Jun [22] et al studied the prediction ability of SVM, logistic model, and random forest model. e conclusion is that the prediction ability of random forest model is always better than that of SVM model, while the prediction ability of SVM model with parameter selector is better than that of logistic model [23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Olafsson and Li [27] applied a decision tree to learn directly from scheduling data where the selected instances are identified as preferred training data. Jun et al [28] proposed a random-forest-based approach to extract dispatching rules from the best schedules. This approach includes schedule generation, rule learning, and discretization such that they could minimize the average total weighted tardiness for job shop scheduling.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%