2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2020.103700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning dynamical systems with bifurcations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that mirroring the pitch orientation and not tracking the yaw rotation is more intuitive for subjects and simultaneously results in more accurate tracking. Then, the desired pose of the robot EE is passed to a predefined linear dynamical system (DS) [30] to find the desired translational and angular velocities. These velocities serve as the inputs for our underlying compliant and passive controller [31,32] that outputs a set of joint torques for the robotic arm.…”
Section: Robotic Arm Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that mirroring the pitch orientation and not tracking the yaw rotation is more intuitive for subjects and simultaneously results in more accurate tracking. Then, the desired pose of the robot EE is passed to a predefined linear dynamical system (DS) [30] to find the desired translational and angular velocities. These velocities serve as the inputs for our underlying compliant and passive controller [31,32] that outputs a set of joint torques for the robotic arm.…”
Section: Robotic Arm Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics cannot yet be accurate due to ubiquitous noises and disturbances. Many learning methods are presented to address it, such as reusing existed experience [21], employing an episodic method [11], exploiting Hopf bifurcations [18], recruiting recurrent spiking neuron networks [13], and so forth. The inverse dynamics also attracts attention in designing appropriate motion, and an example is the design of model-based controllers, which cancel out non-linearities and track with zero-error.…”
Section: A Robot Dynamics Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Back-propagation through differential equation solvers has been a breakthrough over the past couple of years [16,17] that enabled scalable parameter inference for differential equations from trajectory data. Although one could use trajectory data to create the aforementioned qualitative constraints [18,19] this would entail over-constraining information originating from the kinetics and dynamical transients of the model. Furthermore, such data usually does not contain sufficient information about dynamical transients in order to identify kinetic parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%