Learning from intelligent failure: an organizational resource for school improvement

Abstract

PurposeSchools are complex and imperfect organizations; thus, it is not possible for school leaders to completely avoid failures. The capacity to learn from failure is essential to the effectiveness of teachers as individuals and for teams and schools. However, it is hardly practiced in most schools. The present theoretical article seeks to offer an integrative conceptual framework in which intelligent failure is conceptualized as an organizational learning process. The purpose is twofold: first, to address the question of why school faculty fails to learn from failure; second, to show how learning from intelligent failure in the school context can be framed as a resource for school improvement.Design/methodology/approachThe present theoretical article seeks to offer an integrative conceptual framework in which intelligent failure is conceptualized as an organizational learning process.FindingsThe present study draws upon the social capital theory as an overarching framework to develop a conceptual model that incorporates the learning settings and a leadership tolerant of “intelligent failure” that might enable us to identify the root causes of failure and the kinds of lessons that can be drawn from failure analysis. In the proposed conceptual model, school organizational features combine with a leadership tolerant of intelligent failures to enhance opportunities to analyze, manage and learn from intelligent failures in school settings.Originality/valueAn important lacuna in educational scholarship is that although detecting and correcting school failures is normal, investigating the root causes of these failures or pinpointing the behaviors necessary to avoid their reoccurrence is often neglected in both theory and practice. By integrating research from both non-educational and educational literature, this study may provide a new perspective for school management, since it emphasizes the reframing of intelligent failure as an organizational asset for school improvement. The present study broadens the literature on educational management and organizational learning and provides a new approach for school failures and failure management.

Nurturing a Climate of Innovation in a Didactic Educational System: A Case Study Exploring Leadership in Private Schools in Turkey

“…Three subthemes emerged as key components of such a collaborative learning ecosystem: tolerance of diversity, tolerance of chaos, and tolerance of failure. Confirming the results of the previous research (Benoliel & Berkovich, 2020;Daas et al, 2020;Darabi et al, 2018;Louis & Robinson, 2012), the current study asserts that an innovation climate can be nurtured in a diverse and vibrant school environment through the collaborative learning experiences of risk-taking school members who learn from their intelligent failures. Such a learning ecosystem requires a school leader who performs the "networked leadership" roles (Leithwood, 2019) through building learning communities, providing the required support for learning, coordinating the common activities, nurturing the practices for cooperation, and facilitating collaborative work of school members.…”

Knowledge acquisition from innovation failures: a study of micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs)

“…The concept that failure can trigger creativity has been a subject of scholarly investigation for a considerable time (Creely et al , 2019). Empirical evidence suggests that failure may lead to the emergence of novel strategies and procedures (Benoliel and Berkovich, 2021), an increased propensity for risk-taking (Neves and Eisenberger, 2014) and, ultimately, increased creativity (Stenmark, 2005). This study contends that KAFIF also promotes critical thinking and developing new strategies based on the previous literature’s argument.…”

Exploring the Possibility of Learning from Failure through the Analysis of Best Failure Practices of Proactive Administration Services

“…최근 정상과학으로 새롭게 대두하고 있는 실패학(failureology, learning from failure)에서는 과거의 성공경험보다는 실패경험으로부터 더 많은 학습의 기회가 있음을 제시한다 [1][2][3][4][5]. 실패학습이란 실패경험으로부터의 학습과정을 주목하며, 실패당사자의 경험으로 사장되지 않고 그러한 실패경험에서 학습한 지식을 실패경험을 지식화하고, 이를 공유 및 확산하는 실패지식의 자산화(assetization) 측면을 의미한다 [6].…”

“…지적 실패의 조건을 부각하기 위하여 연구자들은 '지적 실패'와 '비-지적' 실패를 구별한다. 비-지적 실패는 기존 지식과 자원을 이용하여 피할 수 있는 실패이다(예: 동일한 실패를 반복하는 것 혹은 부주의로 인한 실패 등), 반면 지적 실패는 정답이 존재하지 않는 새로움이라는 경계를 넘는 혁신을 향한 노력으로 이해한다 [5].…”