2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11653-2_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Implicit and Explicit Control in Model Transformations by Example

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, to our best knowledge, none of the contributions above can derive rules that require testing string attribute values or exploring a global context except for Baki et al [2014], where the result returned by a user-defined query can be used in rule conditions. We also noticed that most MTBE contributions illustrate their respective approaches using simplified transformation problems or toy examples without showing the complexity and correctness of the rules that can be learned.…”
Section: Example-based Model Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, to our best knowledge, none of the contributions above can derive rules that require testing string attribute values or exploring a global context except for Baki et al [2014], where the result returned by a user-defined query can be used in rule conditions. We also noticed that most MTBE contributions illustrate their respective approaches using simplified transformation problems or toy examples without showing the complexity and correctness of the rules that can be learned.…”
Section: Example-based Model Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The algorithm is similar to the one described in Baki et al [2014] except it uses transformation traces to reduce the size of the search space. Unlike for the proposed approach, the standard GP algorithm aims to learn all the transformation program in a single step.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations